igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Submitted by LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM @l4kshmi

Assigned to Intel GFX Bugs mailing list

Link to original bug (#112392)

Description

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7418/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
Starting subtest: flink-and-close-vma-leak
(gem_ppgtt:3385) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function flink_and_close, file ../tests/i915/gem_ppgtt.c:285:
(gem_ppgtt:3385) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: offset == offset_new
(gem_ppgtt:3385) CRITICAL: error: 0 != 4096
Subtest flink-and-close-vma-leak failed.
**** DEBUG ****
(gem_ppgtt:3385) drmtest-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: !(fd<0)
(gem_ppgtt:3385) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: gem_uses_full_ppgtt(fd)
(gem_ppgtt:3385) drmtest-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: !(fd<0)
(gem_ppgtt:3385) igt_debugfs-DEBUG: Opening debugfs directory '/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0'
(gem_ppgtt:3385) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function flink_and_close, file ../tests/i915/gem_ppgtt.c:285:
(gem_ppgtt:3385) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: offset == offset_new
(gem_ppgtt:3385) CRITICAL: error: 0 != 4096
(gem_ppgtt:3385) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace:
(gem_ppgtt:3385) igt_core-INFO: #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1830 __igt_fail_assert()
(gem_ppgtt:3385) igt_core-INFO: #1 (moved) ../tests/i915/gem_ppgtt.c:328 __real_main293()
(gem_ppgtt:3385) igt_core-INFO: #2 [<unknown>+0x0]
**** END ****
Subtest flink-and-close-vma-leak: FAIL (0.023s)

added CI feature: GEM platform: BXT platform: GLK platform: ICL platform: KBL platform: SKL platform: TGL + 1 deleted label

Chris Wilson @ickle said:

Harrumph. Just appears to be an unfortunate timing in that we did not retire the vma (i915_vma_parked during gt_parked). Odd. Although there are a number of trylocks in i915_vma_parked which might cause deferral.

CI Bug Log said:

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

New filters associated

* APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_5361/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7418/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15426/shard-apl7/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_5371/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

CI Bug Log said:

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new
APL KBL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7420/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

CI Bug Log said:

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

APL KBL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new
APL KBL GLK: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new


No new failures caught with the new filter

CI Bug Log said:

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

APL KBL GLK: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new
APL SKL KBL GLK TGL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5306/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
  
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7421/shard-skl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
  
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7422/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

CI Bug Log said:

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

APL SKL KBL GLK TGL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new
APL SKL KBL GLK ICL TGL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5312/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

added feature: GEM/ppGTT + 1 deleted label and removed feature: GEM platform: BXT platform: GLK platform: ICL platform: KBL platform: SKL platform: TGL + 1 deleted label

changed title from [CI][SHARDS]igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new to igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

removed 1 deleted label

added severity::minor label and removed 1 deleted label

marked #1013 (closed) as a duplicate of this issue

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

APL SKL KBL GLK ICL TGL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new BYT HSW BDW GEN9 ICL EHL TGL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

No new failures caught with the new filter

added platform: BXT label

added platform: BDW platform: EHL platform: GEN9 platform: HSW platform: ICL labels

added platform: TGL label

added platform: BYT label

Papered over by

commit 3447c4c55d0edc95742fdcd91c3efb050546b907
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Mar 23 09:28:35 2020 +0000

    drm/i915: Avoid live-lock with i915_vma_parked()
    
    Abuse^W Take advantage that we know we are inside the GT wakeref and
    that prevents any client execbuf from reopening the i915_vma in order to
    claim all the vma to close without having to drop the spinlock to free
    each one individually. By keeping the spinlock, we do not have to
    restart if we run concurrently with i915_gem_free_objects -- which
    causes them both to restart continually and make very very slow
    progress.
    
    Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1361
    Fixes: 77853186e547 ("drm/i915: Claim vma while under closed_lock in i915_vma_parked()")
    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323092841.22240-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

which is good enough for now.

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5568/shard-glk8/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html Seen again on IGT_5568_full (17 hours, 47 minutes old).

closed

reopened

added platform: BSW/CHT label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: BSW BYT HSW BDW GEN9 ICL EHL TGL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-glkb1", "shard-glkb3", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-bdw-gvtdvm", "shard-hsw6", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-hsw3", "shard-kbl5", "shard-hsw7", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-glkb6", "shard-hsw5", "shard-glkb2", "fi-byt-n2820", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-hsw-4770r", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "fi-bdw-5557u", "shard-glkb4", "shard-apl8", "fi-bsw-n3050", "fi-byt-j1900", "shard-apl1", "shard-hsw8", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-hsw4", "fi-kbl-7500u", "fi-hsw-4770", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-glkb5", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "shard-hsw1", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-cfl-s2", "shard-hsw2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-cfl-8700k", "fi-cfl-u", "fi-cfl-s3", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-hsw", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glkb", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "pig-skl-6600", "pig-glk-j4005", "fi-hsw-4200u", "fi-hsw-peppy", "pig-glk-j5005", "fi-byt-squawks", "fi-bsw-cyan", "fi-cfl-guc", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-cfl-u2", "pig-skl-6260u", "fi-whl-u", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-cfl-8109u", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-icl-u", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-byt-clapper", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-bdw-samus", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-icl-u2", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-iclb", "shard-iclb1", "shard-iclb2", "shard-iclb3", "shard-iclb4", "shard-iclb5", "shard-iclb6", "fi-icl-u3", "shard-iclb7", "fi-icl-y", "fi-skl-lmem", "shard-iclb8", "fi-icl-guc", "fi-icl-dsi", "re-icl-u", "fi-cml-u", "re-cml-u", "fi-cml-u2", "fi-icl-u4", "fi-tgl-u", "fi-cml-h", "fi-cml-s", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-apl0", "shard-glk0", "shard-kbl0", "shard-skl0", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "fi-bsw-nick", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-icl-1065g7", "fi-tgl-guc", "fi-ehl-1", "re-ehl-1", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "re-ehl-cham", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "pig-icl-1065g7", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["BYT", "HSW", "BDW", "ICLBSW", "TGICL", "GEN9", "EHL", "TGL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_512/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_517/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

Issue is not observed on EHL,TGL,SKL,CFL,CML,BXT,GLK,KBL,HSW,ICL,BDW,BSD,BYT. Hence closing this big id #644 (closed)

• shards log :- http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/tree/drm-tip/shards-all.html?testfilter=igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak

• EHL,CFL,CML,BXT,WHL Logs : http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/results/all?query_key=e1aae3c3d1e7c2e4f14ca2e53e035f33d5576779

• BDW,BSW,BYT Logs : http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/results/all?query_key=591eaa8a56a56f4d8186679b8a0cdfd71ba01a43

closed

reopened

removed platform: BDW label

removed platform: BSW/CHT label

removed platform: BYT label

removed platform: GEN9 label

removed platform: ICL label

removed platform: TGL label

removed platform: HSW label

removed platform: EHL label

added platform: GLK platform: SKL labels

This is still happening regularly on SKL GLK APL.

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: BSW BYT HSW BDW GEN9 ICKL EHL TGLK APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "fi-skl-6260u", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-apl2", "shard-skl10", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "shard-apl8", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-apl4", "shard-apl3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["BYTGLK", "HSW", "BDW", "BSW", "ICAPL", "GEN9", "EHL", "TGSKL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

No new failures caught with the new filter

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: BXT SKL GLK APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "fi-skl-6260u", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-apl2", "shard-skl10", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-bxt-j4205", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "shard-apl8", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-apl4", "shard-apl3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["GLK", "APL", "SKL", "BXT"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1060/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: BSW BXT SKL GLK APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "fi-skl-6260u", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-apl2", "shard-skl10", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-bxt-j4205", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "shard-apl8", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-apl4", "shard-apl3", "fi-bsw-nick", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["GLK", "APLBSW", "SKL", "BXT", "GLK", "APL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1064/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1064/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1067/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

added platform: BSW/CHT label

added platform: BDW label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: BDW BSW BXT SKL GLK APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-bdw-gvtdvm", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "fi-skl-6260u", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-apl2", "shard-skl10", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-bxt-j4205", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "fi-bdw-5557u", "shard-apl8", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-apl4", "shard-apl3", "fi-bsw-nick", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-bdw-samus"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["BDW", "BSW", "SKL", "BXT", "GLK", "APL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1068/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: KBL BDW BSW BXT SKL GLK APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-kbl3", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-bdw-gvtdvm", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "fi-skl-6260u", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-apl2", "shard-skl10", "shard-kbl5", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "fi-skl-lmem", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "fi-bdw-5557u", "shard-apl8", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-kbl-7500u", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "shard-skl9", "fi-bsw-nick", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "pig-kbl-iris", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-bdw-samus"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["BDW", "BSW", "SKL", "BXT", "KBL", "GLK", "APL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1068/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

added platform: KBL label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: ADL-P KBL BDW BSW BXT SKL GLK APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-bdw-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-kbl5", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "fi-bdw-5557u", "shard-apl8", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-kbl-7500u", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-bdw-samus", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-bsw-nick", "pig-kbl-iris", "bat-adlp-4", "re-adlp-pub1", "re-adlp-pub3", "re-adlp-pub2", "re-adlp-5", "re-adlp-11", "bat-adlp-6"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["BDW", "BSW", "SKL", "BXT", "KBL", "GLK", "APL", "ADL-P"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11844/re-adlp-5/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

added platform: ADL_P label

added platform: RKL label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: RKL ADL-P KBL BDW BSW BXT SKL GLK APL: igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak - fail - Failed assertion: offset == offset_new

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-bdw-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-kbl5", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "fi-bdw-5557u", "shard-apl8", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-kbl-7500u", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-bdw-samus", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-bsw-nick", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "bat-rkl-1", "fi-rkl-11500t", "pig-kbl-iris", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "bat-adlp-4", "re-adlp-pub1", "shard-rkl", "fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "re-adlp-pub3", "re-adlp-pub2", "re-adlp-5", "re-adlp-11", "bat-adlp-6"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["BDW", "BSW", "SKL", "BXT", "KBL", "GLK", "RKL", "APL", "ADL-P"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: offset == offset_new'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_6587/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

On CI, last seen this issue on Aug. 10, 2022, 12:18 p.m. Closing this issue as can not reproduce.

closed

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived.

New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.