igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(bcs0|vcs1|vecs0|rcs0|vcs0) - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_status(spin->out_fence) == 0, error: -5 != 0

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8922/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html

Starting subtest: basic-many-active
Starting dynamic subtest: rcs0
(gem_exec_reloc:1478) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function __many_active, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c:390:
(gem_exec_reloc:1478) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: sync_fence_status(spin->out_fence) == 0
(gem_exec_reloc:1478) CRITICAL: error: -5 != 0
Dynamic subtest rcs0 failed.

added CI feature: GEM platform: TGL labels

added platform: GEN9 platform: HSW platform: ICL platform: SNB labels

SNB TGL: igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(vcs0|vecs0|vcs1) - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -5 != 0

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5771/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1.html

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5771/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1.html

added platform: RKL label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: SNB HSW GEN9 ICL RKL TGL: igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(bcs0|vcs1|vecs0|rcs0|vcs0) - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_status(spin->out_fence) == 0, error: -5 != 0

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "shard-snb7", "shard-snb3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-glkb1", "shard-glkb3", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-snb2", "shard-hsw6", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-hsw3", "shard-kbl5", "shard-snb5", "shard-hsw7", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-glkb6", "shard-hsw5", "shard-glkb2", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-snb-2600", "fi-hsw-4770r", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "shard-glkb4", "shard-apl8", "shard-apl1", "shard-hsw8", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-hsw4", "fi-kbl-7500u", "fi-hsw-4770", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-glkb5", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "shard-hsw1", "shard-snb4", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-cfl-s2", "shard-snb6", "shard-hsw2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-snb1", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-cfl-8700k", "fi-cfl-u", "fi-cfl-s3", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-hsw", "shard-kbl", "shard-snb", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glkb", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "pig-skl-6600", "pig-glk-j4005", "fi-hsw-4200u", "fi-hsw-peppy", "pig-glk-j5005", "fi-cfl-guc", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-cfl-u2", "pig-skl-6260u", "fi-whl-u", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-cfl-8109u", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-icl-u", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-icl-u2", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-iclb", "shard-iclb1", "shard-iclb2", "shard-iclb3", "shard-iclb4", "shard-iclb5", "shard-iclb6", "fi-icl-u3", "shard-iclb7", "fi-icl-y", "fi-skl-lmem", "shard-iclb8", "fi-icl-guc", "fi-icl-dsi", "re-icl-u", "fi-cml-u", "re-cml-u", "fi-cml-u2", "fi-icl-u4", "fi-tgl-u", "fi-cml-h", "fi-cml-s", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-apl0", "shard-glk0", "shard-kbl0", "shard-skl0", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-icl-1065g7", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "pig-icl-1065g7", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "re-rkl-1", "re-rkl-cham"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["SNB", "ICL", "HSW", "TGL", "GEN9"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: sync_fence_status\(spin->out_fence\) == 0\n.*error: -5 != 0'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8924/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8924/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum.

New filters associated

• SNB TGL: igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(vcs0|vecs0|vcs1) - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -5 != 0 (No new failures associated)

mentioned in issue #2384 (closed)

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: SNB RKL TGL: igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(vcs0|vecs0|vcs1) - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -5 != 0

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-snb7", "shard-snb3", "shard-snb2", "fi-snb-2520m", "shard-snb5", "fi-snb-2600", "fi-tgl-u", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "shard-snb4", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-tgl-guc", "shard-snb6", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "shard-snb1", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "re-rkl-1", "re-rkl-cham", "shard-snb"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["SNB", "TGL", "SNBm"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf\(fd, execbuf\) == 0\n.*error: -5 != 0'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8924/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8924/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0.html

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: SNB HSW BDW GEN9 ICL RKL TGL: igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(bcs0|vcs1|vecs0|rcs0|vcs0) - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_status(spin->out_fence) == 0, error: -5 != 0

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "shard-snb7", "shard-snb3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-glkb1", "shard-glkb3", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-bdw-gvtdvm", "shard-snb2", "shard-hsw6", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-hsw3", "shard-kbl5", "shard-snb5", "shard-hsw7", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-glkb6", "shard-hsw5", "shard-glkb2", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-snb-2600", "fi-hsw-4770r", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "fi-bdw-5557u", "shard-glkb4", "shard-apl8", "shard-apl1", "shard-hsw8", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-hsw4", "fi-kbl-7500u", "fi-hsw-4770", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-glkb5", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "shard-hsw1", "shard-snb4", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-cfl-s2", "shard-snb6", "shard-hsw2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-snb1", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-cfl-8700k", "fi-cfl-u", "fi-cfl-s3", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-hsw", "shard-kbl", "shard-snb", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glkb", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "pig-skl-6600", "pig-glk-j4005", "fi-hsw-4200u", "fi-hsw-peppy", "pig-glk-j5005", "fi-cfl-guc", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-cfl-u2", "pig-skl-6260u", "fi-whl-u", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-cfl-8109u", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-icl-u", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-bdw-samus", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-icl-u2", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-iclb", "shard-iclb1", "shard-iclb2", "shard-iclb3", "shard-iclb4", "shard-iclb5", "shard-iclb6", "fi-icl-u3", "shard-iclb7", "fi-icl-y", "fi-skl-lmem", "shard-iclb8", "fi-icl-guc", "fi-icl-dsi", "re-icl-u", "fi-cml-u", "re-cml-u", "fi-cml-u2", "fi-icl-u4", "fi-tgl-u", "fi-cml-h", "fi-cml-s", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-apl0", "shard-glk0", "shard-kbl0", "shard-skl0", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-icl-1065g7", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "pig-icl-1065g7", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "re-rkl-1", "re-rkl-cham"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["SNB", "ICL", "HSW", "BDW", "TGL", "GEN9"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: sync_fence_status\(spin->out_fence\) == 0\n.*error: -5 != 0'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0.html

added platform: ALL label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: SNBAll HSW BDW GEN9 ICL RKL TGLmachines: igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(bcs0|vcs1|vecs0|rcs0|vcs0) - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_status(spin->out_fence) == 0, error: -5 != 0

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["re-rkl-1", "re-rkl-cham"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["SNB", "ICL", "HSW", "BDW", "TGL", "GEN9"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: sync_fence_status\(spin->out_fence\) == 0\n.*error: -5 != 0'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ehl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ehl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ehl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-elk-e7500/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-elk-e7500/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ilk-650/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ilk-650/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ivb-3770/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ivb-3770/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-ivb-3770/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-snb-2520m/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_625/fi-snb-2520m/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html

assigned to @mlankhorst

@mlankhorst this seems related to the ww.mutex series, could you take a look?

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: All machines: igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@(bcs0|vcs1|vecs0|rcs0|vcs0) - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_status(spin->out_fence) == 0, error: -5 != 0

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND machine_name IS IN ["re-ehl-1"] AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs1", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0", "igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: sync_fence_status\(spin->out_fence\) == 0\n.*error: -5 != 0'

No new failures caught with the new filter

added platform: EHL label

Issue Observed on RKL with CI resume on DRM_9126 and IGT_5810

Log : http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/testresult/765168582?query_key=88a57337525b4f0f6e69cf233906c7ac4b1f2666

Issue Observed on RKL with CI resume on DRM_9161 and IGT_5821

Log : http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/metrics/passrate_per_test?query_key=77155af8bd8df45d38189ebe829519acd590b63f

Issue is reproducing on TGL,HSW,ICL,SNB with IGT_5821 & CI_DRM_9161 in shard runs

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9161/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9161/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9161/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9161/shard-snb5/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html

Issue is not observed on EHL with DRM-9265 and IGT-5832 in resume run.

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9265/re-ehl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9265/re-ehl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@bcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9265/re-ehl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vcs0.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9265/re-ehl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@vecs0.html