- Sep 09, 2020
-
-
Gabriel Krisman authored
Reading past end of file returns EOF for aligned reads but -EINVAL for unaligned reads on f2fs. While documentation is not strict about this corner case, most filesystem returns EOF on this case, like iomap filesystems. This patch consolidates the behavior for f2fs, by making it return EOF(0). it can be verified by a read loop on a file that does a partial read before EOF (A file that doesn't end at an aligned address). The following code fails on an unaligned file on f2fs, but not on btrfs, ext4, and xfs. while (done < total) { ssize_t delta = pread(fd, buf + done, total - done, off + done); if (!delta) break; ... } It is arguable whether filesystems should actually return EOF or -EINVAL, but since iomap filesystems support it, and so does the original DIO code, it seems reasonable to consolidate on that. Signed-off-by:Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com> Reviewed-by:
Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Sahitya Tummala authored
If the sbi->ckpt->next_free_nid is not NAT block aligned and if there are free nids in that NAT block between the start of the block and next_free_nid, then those free nids will not be scanned in scan_nat_page(). This results into mismatch between nm_i->available_nids and the sum of nm_i->free_nid_count of all NAT blocks scanned. And nm_i->available_nids will always be greater than the sum of free nids in all the blocks. Under this condition, if we use all the currently scanned free nids, then it will loop forever in f2fs_alloc_nid() as nm_i->available_nids is still not zero but nm_i->free_nid_count of that partially scanned NAT block is zero. Fix this to align the nm_i->next_scan_nid to the first nid of the corresponding NAT block. Signed-off-by:
Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by:
-
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki authored
Commit da52f8ad ("f2fs: get the right gc victim section when section has several segments") added code to count blocks of each section using variables with type 'unsigned short', which has 2 bytes size in many systems. However, the counts can be larger than the 2 bytes range and type conversion results in wrong values. Especially when the f2fs sections have blocks as many as USHRT_MAX + 1, the count is handled as 0. This triggers eternal loop in init_dirty_segmap() at mount system call. Fix this by changing the type of the variables to block_t. Fixes: da52f8ad ("f2fs: get the right gc victim section when section has several segments") Signed-off-by:
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- Sep 07, 2020
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When trying to get a new fs root for a snapshot during the transaction at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(), if btrfs_get_new_fs_root() fails we leave "pending->snap" pointing to an error pointer, and then later at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we dereference that pointer, resulting in a crash: [12264.614689] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000007c4 [12264.615650] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [12264.616487] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [12264.617436] PGD 0 P4D 0 [12264.618328] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [12264.619150] CPU: 0 PID: 2310635 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-btrfs-next-67 #1 [12264.619960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [12264.621769] RIP: 0010:btrfs_mksubvol+0x438/0x4a0 [btrfs] [12264.622528] Code: bc ef ff ff (...) [12264.624092] RSP: 0018:ffffaa6fc7277cd8 EFLAGS: 00010282 [12264.624669] RAX: 00000000fffffff4 RBX: ffff9d3e8f151a60 RCX: 0000000000000000 [12264.625249] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9d56c9be RDI: fffffffffffffff4 [12264.625830] RBP: ffff9d3e8f151b48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [12264.626413] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000fffffff4 [12264.626994] R13: ffff9d3ede380538 R14: ffff9d3ede380500 R15: ffff9d3f61b2eeb8 [12264.627582] FS: 00007f140d5d8200(0000) GS:ffff9d3fb5e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [12264.628176] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [12264.628773] CR2: 00000000000007c4 CR3: 000000020f8e8004 CR4: 00000000003706f0 [12264.629379] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [12264.629994] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [12264.630594] Call Trace: [12264.631227] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] [12264.631840] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] [12264.632458] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] [12264.633078] btrfs_ioctl+0x1864/0x3130 [btrfs] [12264.633689] ? do_sys_openat2+0x1a7/0x2d0 [12264.634295] ? kmem_cache_free+0x147/0x3a0 [12264.634899] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [12264.635488] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [12264.636058] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [12264.636616] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 (gdb) list *(btrfs_mksubvol+0x438) 0x7c7b8 is in btrfs_mksubvol (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:858). 853 ret = 0; 854 pending_snapshot->anon_dev = 0; 855 fail: 856 /* Prevent double freeing of anon_dev */ 857 if (ret && pending_snapshot->snap) 858 pending_snapshot->snap->anon_dev = 0; 859 btrfs_put_root(pending_snapshot->snap); 860 btrfs_subvolume_release_metadata(root, &pending_snapshot->block_rsv); 861 free_pending: 862 if (pending_snapshot->anon_dev) So fix this by setting "pending->snap" to NULL if we get an error from the call to btrfs_get_new_fs_root() at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(). Fixes: 2dfb1e43 ("btrfs: preallocate anon block device at first phase of snapshot creation") Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
While testing a weird problem with -o degraded, I noticed I was getting leaked root errors BTRFS warning (device loop0): writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices BTRFS error (device loop0): open_ctree failed BTRFS error (device loop0): leaked root -9-0 refcount 1 This is the DATA_RELOC root, which gets read before the other fs roots, but is included in the fs roots radix tree. Handle this by adding a btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root() on the data reloc root if it exists. This is ok to do here if we fail further up because we will only drop the ref if we delete the root from the radix tree, and all other cleanup won't be duplicated. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] A completely sane converted fs will cause kernel warning at balance time: [ 1557.188633] BTRFS info (device sda7): relocating block group 8162107392 flags data [ 1563.358078] BTRFS info (device sda7): found 11722 extents [ 1563.358277] BTRFS info (device sda7): leaf 7989321728 gen 95 total ptrs 213 free space 3458 owner 2 [ 1563.358280] item 0 key (7984947200 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [ 1563.358281] extent refs 1 gen 90 flags 2 [ 1563.358282] ref#0: tree block backref root 4 [ 1563.358285] item 1 key (7985602560 169 0) itemoff 16217 itemsize 33 [ 1563.358286] extent refs 1 gen 93 flags 258 [ 1563.358287] ref#0: shared block backref parent 7985602560 [ 1563.358288] (parent 7985602560 is NOT ALIGNED to nodesize 16384) [ 1563.358290] item 2 key (7985635328 169 0) itemoff 16184 itemsize 33 ... [ 1563.358995] BTRFS error (device sda7): eb 7989321728 invalid extent inline ref type 182 [ 1563.358996] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1563.359005] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 2930 at 0xffffffff9f231766 Then with transaction abort, and obviously failed to balance the fs. [CAUSE] That mentioned inline ref type 182 is completely sane, it's BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, it's some extra check making kernel to believe it's invalid. Commit 64ecdb64 ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref type") introduced extra checks for backref type. One of the requirement is, parent bytenr must be aligned to node size, which is not correct. One example is like this: 0 1G 1G+4K 2G 2G+4K | |///////////////////|//| <- A chunk starts at 1G+4K | | <- A tree block get reserved at bytenr 1G+4K Then we have a valid tree block at bytenr 1G+4K, but not aligned to nodesize (16K). Such chunk is not ideal, but current kernel can handle it pretty well. We may warn about such tree block in the future, but should not reject them. [FIX] Change the alignment requirement from node size alignment to sector size alignment. Also, to make our lives a little easier, also output @iref when btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type() failed, so we can locate the item easier. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205475 Fixes: 64ecdb64 ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref type") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> [ update comments and messages ] Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Nikolay reported a lockdep splat in generic/476 that I could reproduce with btrfs/187. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9e8ef38b6268 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x1a0 btrfs_alloc_device+0x43/0x210 add_missing_dev+0x20/0x90 read_one_chunk+0x301/0x430 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x17b/0x1b0 open_ctree+0xa62/0x1896 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x379 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 vfs_rmdir.part.0+0x149/0x160 do_rmdir+0x136/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa9d65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9e8e9da260e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x92/0xc8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x11e/0x500 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This is because we are holding the chunk_mutex when we call btrfs_alloc_device, which does a GFP_KERNEL allocation. We don't want to switch that to a GFP_NOFS lock because this is the only place where it matters. So instead use memalloc_nofs_save() around the allocation in order to avoid the lockdep splat. Reported-by:Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ronnie Sahlberg authored
RHBZ: 1871246 If during cifs_lookup()/get_inode_info() we encounter a DFS link and we use the cifsacl or modefromsid mount options we must suppress any -EREMOTE errors that triggers or else we will not be able to follow the DFS link and automount the target. This fixes an issue with modefromsid/cifsacl where these mountoptions would break DFS and we would no longer be able to access the share. Signed-off-by:
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@cjr.nz> Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
-
- Sep 05, 2020
-
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
While looking for ->files in ->defer_list, consider that requests there may actually be links. Signed-off-by:
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
While trying to cancel requests with ->files, it also should look for requests in ->defer_list, otherwise it might end up hanging a thread. Cancel all requests in ->defer_list up to the last request there with matching ->files, that's needed to follow drain ordering semantics. Signed-off-by:
-
Mikulas Patocka authored
When running in a dax mode, if the user maps a page with MAP_PRIVATE and PROT_WRITE, the xfs filesystem would incorrectly update ctime and mtime when the user hits a COW fault. This breaks building of the Linux kernel. How to reproduce: 1. extract the Linux kernel tree on dax-mounted xfs filesystem 2. run make clean 3. run make -j12 4. run make -j12 at step 4, make would incorrectly rebuild the whole kernel (although it was already built in step 3). The reason for the breakage is that almost all object files depend on objtool. When we run objtool, it takes COW page fault on its .data section, and these faults will incorrectly update the timestamp of the objtool binary. The updated timestamp causes make to rebuild the whole tree. Signed-off-by:
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mikulas Patocka authored
When running in a dax mode, if the user maps a page with MAP_PRIVATE and PROT_WRITE, the ext2 filesystem would incorrectly update ctime and mtime when the user hits a COW fault. This breaks building of the Linux kernel. How to reproduce: 1. extract the Linux kernel tree on dax-mounted ext2 filesystem 2. run make clean 3. run make -j12 4. run make -j12 at step 4, make would incorrectly rebuild the whole kernel (although it was already built in step 3). The reason for the breakage is that almost all object files depend on objtool. When we run objtool, it takes COW page fault on its .data section, and these faults will incorrectly update the timestamp of the objtool binary. The updated timestamp causes make to rebuild the whole tree. Signed-off-by:
-
Jens Axboe authored
If we exceed UIO_FASTIOV, we don't handle the transition correctly between an allocated vec for requests that are queued with IOSQE_ASYNC. Store the iovec appropriately and re-set it in the iter iov in case it changed. Fixes: ff6165b2 ("io_uring: retain iov_iter state over io_read/io_write calls") Reported-by:
Nick Hill <nick@nickhill.org> Tested-by:
Norman Maurer <norman.maurer@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chuck Lever authored
If a write delegation isn't available, the Linux NFS client uses a zero-stateid when performing a SETATTR. NFSv4.0 provides no mechanism for an NFS server to match such a request to a particular client. It recalls all delegations for that file, even delegations held by the client issuing the request. If that client happens to hold a read delegation, the server will recall it immediately, resulting in an NFS4ERR_DELAY/CB_RECALL/ DELEGRETURN sequence. Optimize out this pipeline bubble by having the client return any delegations it may hold on a file before it issues a SETATTR(zero-stateid) on that file. Signed-off-by:
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- Sep 04, 2020
-
-
Vladis Dronov authored
The '#ifdef MODULE' check in the original commit does not work as intended. The code under the check is not built at all if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y. Fix this by using a correct check. Fixes: 275678e7 ("debugfs: Check module state before warning in {full/open}_proxy_open()") Signed-off-by:
Vladis Dronov <vdronov@redhat.com> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200811150129.53343-1-vdronov@redhat.com Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- Sep 03, 2020
-
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
The realtime flag only applies to the data fork, so don't use the realtime block number checks on the attr fork of a realtime file. Fixes: 30b0984d ("xfs: refactor bmap record validation") Signed-off-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
- Sep 02, 2020
-
-
Jens Axboe authored
Actually two things that need fixing up here: - The io_rw_reissue() -EAGAIN retry is explicit to block devices and regular files, so don't ever attempt to do that on other types of files. - If we hit -EAGAIN on a nonblock marked file, don't arm poll handler for it. It should just complete with -EAGAIN. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by:
-
Al Viro authored
epoll_loop_check_proc() can run into a file already committed to destruction; we can't grab a reference on those and don't need to add them to the set for reverse path check anyway. Tested-by:
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Fixes: a9ed4a65 ("epoll: Keep a reference on files added to the check list") Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Jiufei Xue authored
While io_sqe_file_register() failed in __io_sqe_files_update(), table->files[i] still point to the original file which may freed soon, and that will trigger use-after-free problems. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f3bd9dae ("io_uring: fix memleak in __io_sqe_files_update()") Signed-off-by:
Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Sep 01, 2020
-
-
Jiufei Xue authored
Index here is already the position of the file in fixed_file_table, we should not use io_file_from_index() again to get it. Otherwise, the wrong file which still in use may be released unexpectedly. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.6 Fixes: 05f3fb3c ("io_uring: avoid ring quiesce for fixed file set unregister and update") Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 31, 2020
-
-
Max Staudt authored
The basic permission bits (protection bits in AmigaOS) have been broken in Linux' AFFS - it would only set bits, but never delete them. Also, contrary to the documentation, the Archived bit was not handled. Let's fix this for good, and set the bits such that Linux and classic AmigaOS can coexist in the most peaceful manner. Also, update the documentation to represent the current state of things. Fixes: 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Max Staudt <max@enpas.org> Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 28, 2020
-
-
Paulo Alcantara authored
For SMB1, the DFS flag should be checked against tcon->Flags rather than tcon->share_flags. While at it, add an is_tcon_dfs() helper to check for DFS capability in a more generic way. Signed-off-by:
Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>
-
- Aug 27, 2020
-
-
Jens Axboe authored
These events happen inline from submission, so there's no need to bounce them through the original task. Just set them up for retry and issue retry directly instead of going over task_work. Signed-off-by: -
Jens Axboe authored
This normally isn't hit, as polling is mostly done on NVMe with deep queue depths. But if we do run into request starvation, we need to ensure that retries are properly serialized. Reported-by:
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Dan Carpenter authored
The fall through annotation comes after a return statement so it's not reachable. Signed-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
Don't leak kernel memory contents into the shortform attr fork. Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The error message for inode transid is the same as for inode generation, which makes us unable to detect the real problem. Reported-by:
Tyler Richmond <t.d.richmond@gmail.com> Fixes: 496245ca ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify inode item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
These are special extent buffers that get rewound in order to lookup the state of the tree at a specific point in time. As such they do not go through the normal initialization paths that set their lockdep class, so handle them appropriately when they are created and before they are locked. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
When flipping over to the rw_semaphore I noticed I'd get a lockdep splat in replace_path(), which is weird because we're swapping the reloc root with the actual target root. Turns out this is because we're using the root->root_key.objectid as the root id for the newly allocated tree block when setting the lockdep class, however we need to be using the actual owner of this new block, which is saved in owner. The affected path is through btrfs_copy_root as all other callers of btrfs_alloc_tree_block (which calls init_new_buffer) have root_objectid == root->root_key.objectid . CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I got the following lockdep splat while testing: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 but task is already holding lock: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 smp_init+0x26/0x71 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258 kernel_init+0xa/0x103 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by btrfs/229626: #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630 #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other dependencies. Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different problem for which this fix is a solution. Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually assign them to the fs_info. We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to safely free the workqueues. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock: ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by compsize/11122: #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks, which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user(). This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed. Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then copy_to_user_nofault for the copying. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00167-g0d7ba0c5b375-dirty #925 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-uuid/7955 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88bfbafec0f8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffff88bfbafef2a8 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990 btrfs_uuid_tree_add+0x89/0x2d0 btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x330/0x390 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990 btrfs_find_root+0x45/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x100 btrfs_get_root_ref.part.50+0x143/0x630 btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate+0x207/0x314 btrfs_uuid_rescan_kthread+0x12/0x50 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-uuid-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-uuid-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by btrfs-uuid/7955: #0: ffff88bfbafef2a8 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 73 PID: 7955 Comm: btrfs-uuid Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00167-g0d7ba0c5b375-dirty #925 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 ? btrfs_root_node+0x1c/0x1d0 down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990 btrfs_find_root+0x45/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x100 btrfs_get_root_ref.part.50+0x143/0x630 btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate+0x207/0x314 ? btree_readpage+0x20/0x20 btrfs_uuid_rescan_kthread+0x12/0x50 kthread+0x133/0x150 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This problem exists because we have two different rescan threads, btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread which creates the uuid tree, and btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate that goes through and updates or deletes any out of date roots. The problem is they both do things in different order. btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread() reads the tree_root, and then inserts entries into the uuid_root. btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate() scans the uuid_root, but then does a btrfs_get_fs_root() which can read from the tree_root. It's actually easy enough to not be holding the path in btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread() when we add a uuid entry, as we already drop it further down and re-start the search when we loop. So simply move the path release before we add our entry to the uuid tree. This also fixes a problem where we're holding a path open after we do btrfs_end_transaction(), which has it's own problems. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: -
Marcos Paulo de Souza authored
[BUG] After commit 9afc6649 ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item"), cache->length is being assigned after calling btrfs_create_block_group_cache. This causes a problem since set_free_space_tree_thresholds calculates the free-space threshold to decide if the free-space tree should convert from extents to bitmaps. The current code calls set_free_space_tree_thresholds with cache->length being 0, which then makes cache->bitmap_high_thresh zero. This implies the system will always use bitmap instead of extents, which is not desired if the block group is not fragmented. This behavior can be seen by a test that expects to repair systems with FREE_SPACE_EXTENT and FREE_SPACE_BITMAP, but the current code only created FREE_SPACE_BITMAP. [FIX] Call set_free_space_tree_thresholds after setting cache->length. There is now a WARN_ON in set_free_space_tree_thresholds to help preventing the same mistake to happen again in the future. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/251 Fixes: 9afc6649 ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by:
-
Jens Axboe authored
Make sure we clear req->result, which was set to -EAGAIN for retry purposes, when moving it to the reissue list. Otherwise we can end up retrying a request more than once, which leads to weird results in the io-wq handling (and other spots). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by:
-
Olga Kornievskaia authored
A client should be able to handle getting an ERR_DELAY error while doing a LOCK call to reclaim state due to delegation being recalled. This is a transient error that can happen due to server moving its volumes and invalidating its file location cache and upon reference to it during the LOCK call needing to do an expensive lookup (leading to an ERR_DELAY error on a PUTFH). Signed-off-by:
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 26, 2020
-
-
Eric Sandeen authored
The boundary test for the fixed-offset parts of xfs_attr_sf_entry in xfs_attr_shortform_verify is off by one, because the variable array at the end is defined as nameval[1] not nameval[]. Hence we need to subtract 1 from the calculation. This can be shown by: # touch file # setfattr -n root.a file and verifications will fail when it's written to disk. This only matters for a last attribute which has a single-byte name and no value, otherwise the combination of namelen & valuelen will push endp further out and this test won't fail. Fixes: 1e1bbd8e ("xfs: create structure verifier function for shortform xattrs") Signed-off-by:
-
Brian Foster authored
The inode chunk allocation transaction reserves inobt_maxlevels-1 blocks to accommodate a full split of the inode btree. A full split requires an allocation for every existing level and a new root block, which means inobt_maxlevels is the worst case block requirement for a transaction that inserts to the inobt. This can lead to a transaction block reservation overrun when tmpfile creation allocates an inode chunk and expands the inobt to its maximum depth. This problem has been observed in conjunction with overlayfs, which makes frequent use of tmpfiles internally. The existing reservation code goes back as far as the Linux git repo history (v2.6.12). It was likely never observed as a problem because the traditional file/directory creation transactions also include worst case block reservation for directory modifications, which most likely is able to make up for a single block deficiency in the inode allocation portion of the calculation. tmpfile support is relatively more recent (v3.15), less heavily used, and only includes the inode allocation block reservation as tmpfiles aren't linked into the directory tree on creation. Fix up the inode alloc block reservation macro and a couple of the block allocator minleft parameters that enforce an allocation to leave enough free blocks in the AG for a full inobt split. Signed-off-by:
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Brian Foster authored
The recent change to make insert range an atomic operation used the incorrect transaction rolling mechanism. The explicit transaction roll does not finish deferred operations. This means that intents for rmapbt updates caused by extent shifts are not logged until the final transaction commits. Thus if a crash occurs during an insert range, log recovery might leave the rmapbt in an inconsistent state. This was discovered by repeated runs of generic/455. Update insert range to finish dfops on every shift iteration. This is similar to collapse range and ensures that intents are logged with the transactions that make associated changes. Fixes: dd87f87d ("xfs: rework insert range into an atomic operation") Signed-off-by:
-
Jens Axboe authored
The man page for io_uring generally claims were consistent with what preadv2 and pwritev2 accept, but turns out there's a slight discrepancy in how offset == -1 is handled for pipes/streams. preadv doesn't allow it, but preadv2 does. This currently causes io_uring to return -EINVAL if that is attempted, but we should allow that as documented. This change makes us consistent with preadv2/pwritev2 for just passing in a NULL ppos for streams if the offset is -1. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+ Reported-by:
Benedikt Ames <wisp3rwind@posteo.eu> Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 25, 2020
-
-
Jens Axboe authored
We need to call kiocb_done() for any ret < 0 to ensure that we always get the proper -ERESTARTSYS (and friends) transformation done. At some point this should be tied into general error handling, so we can get rid of the various (mostly network) related commands that check and perform this substitution. Signed-off-by:
-
