Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Peter Hutterer's avatar
Peter Hutterer authored
We're using the WpReserveDevice's name as key in the hash table, so we
must update the key as well when we replace an item in the hashtable -
the old device (and its name) will be released.

The side-effect of this is that the *third* device with an identical
name will no longer replace the previous device. This results in the
following sequence:

- dev1 added: name Audio0
  - dev1 requests name owner Audio0
- dev2 added: name Audio0
  - replace dev1 in the hashtable
     - dev1 emits "release" signal
     - dev1 unowns the Audio0 name
  - dev2 requests name owner Audio0
- dev3 added: name Audio0
  - adds to the hashtable because the existing key is now undefined
  - dev3 requests name owner Audio0
     - error, you cannot request ownership for the same name twice

Fixes #93
f4546a18
History
Name Last commit Last update
..