Addition of `gst-clear` meta transform is not backwards compatible
The following discussion from !4962 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@slomo started a discussion: This is not backwards compatible: it assumes that every meta that has a transform function handles the newly added
gst-clear
transform type, which is not yet even the case for any of the metas we define.Also current
transform_func
s assume that the first parameter is neverNULL
(see also the annotations ofGstMetaTransformFunc
).
CC @ocrete