Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
gst-docs
gst-docs
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 42
    • Issues 42
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 17
    • Merge Requests 17
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • GStreamer
  • gst-docsgst-docs
  • Issues
  • #5

Closed
Open
Opened Aug 28, 2016 by Bugzilla Migration User@bugzilla-migration

Links to gstreamermm code snippets in GStreamer documentation

Submitted by Marcin Kolny @loganek

Link to original bug (#770520)

Description

Hi,
At the beginning I'd like to emphasize, that it's just my idea I'd like to discuss with GStreamer core developers, not a GStreamer bug.
However, bugzilla IMO seems to be better place to discuss it than mailing list.
And to really get to the point, I was thinking if we could add links in GStreamer manual to gstreamermm examples with corresponding code snippets.
E.g. there are two sample code blocks on the page: https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/manual/html/section-elements-create.html ; I could create gstreamermm examples for both, and we could add links to C++ version.

If you think it's bad idea, and it'll only make documentation chaotic, it's fine - this is just an idea :)

However, I think it might have a few advantages:

  1. people will know about c++ interface.
  2. it would be easier to learn gstreamermm, since we don't have separated guideline for the wrapper.
Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: gstreamer/gst-docs#5