Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 4d79a126 authored by Ilia Levi's avatar Ilia Levi Committed by Rodrigo Vivi
Browse files

drm/xe: Make irq enabled flag atomic


The irq.enabled flag was protected by a spin lock (irq.lock).
By making it atomic we no longer need to wait for the spin lock in
irq handlers. This will become especially useful for MSI-X irq
handlers to prevent lock contention between different interrupts.

Signed-off-by: default avatarIlia Levi <ilia.levi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241210173506.202150-1-ilia.levi@intel.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
parent 3fcf68d7
No related branches found
Tags drm-xe-next-2024-12-11
No related merge requests found
......@@ -53,18 +53,7 @@ void gen2_irq_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_irq_regs regs,
bool intel_irqs_enabled(struct xe_device *xe)
{
/*
* XXX: i915 has a racy handling of the irq.enabled, since it doesn't
* lock its transitions. Because of that, the irq.enabled sometimes
* is not read with the irq.lock in place.
* However, the most critical cases like vblank and page flips are
* properly using the locks.
* We cannot take the lock in here or run any kind of assert because
* of i915 inconsistency.
* But at this point the xe irq is better protected against races,
* although the full solution would be protecting the i915 side.
*/
return xe->irq.enabled;
return atomic_read(&xe->irq.enabled);
}
void intel_synchronize_irq(struct xe_device *xe)
......
......@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ struct xe_device {
spinlock_t lock;
/** @irq.enabled: interrupts enabled on this device */
bool enabled;
atomic_t enabled;
} irq;
/** @ttm: ttm device */
......
......@@ -348,12 +348,8 @@ static irqreturn_t xelp_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
unsigned long intr_dw[2];
u32 identity[32];
spin_lock(&xe->irq.lock);
if (!xe->irq.enabled) {
spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
if (!atomic_read(&xe->irq.enabled))
return IRQ_NONE;
}
spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
master_ctl = xelp_intr_disable(xe);
if (!master_ctl) {
......@@ -417,12 +413,8 @@ static irqreturn_t dg1_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
/* TODO: This really shouldn't be copied+pasted */
spin_lock(&xe->irq.lock);
if (!xe->irq.enabled) {
spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
if (!atomic_read(&xe->irq.enabled))
return IRQ_NONE;
}
spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
master_tile_ctl = dg1_intr_disable(xe);
if (!master_tile_ctl) {
......@@ -644,12 +636,8 @@ static irqreturn_t vf_mem_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
struct xe_tile *tile;
unsigned int id;
spin_lock(&xe->irq.lock);
if (!xe->irq.enabled) {
spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
if (!atomic_read(&xe->irq.enabled))
return IRQ_NONE;
}
spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
for_each_tile(tile, xe, id)
xe_memirq_handler(&tile->memirq);
......@@ -674,10 +662,9 @@ static void irq_uninstall(void *arg)
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
int irq;
if (!xe->irq.enabled)
if (!atomic_xchg(&xe->irq.enabled, 0))
return;
xe->irq.enabled = false;
xe_irq_reset(xe);
irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
......@@ -724,7 +711,7 @@ int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe)
return err;
}
xe->irq.enabled = true;
atomic_set(&xe->irq.enabled, 1);
xe_irq_postinstall(xe);
......@@ -744,9 +731,7 @@ void xe_irq_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
{
int irq = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev)->irq;
spin_lock_irq(&xe->irq.lock);
xe->irq.enabled = false; /* no new irqs */
spin_unlock_irq(&xe->irq.lock);
atomic_set(&xe->irq.enabled, 0); /* no new irqs */
synchronize_irq(irq); /* flush irqs */
xe_irq_reset(xe); /* turn irqs off */
......@@ -762,7 +747,7 @@ void xe_irq_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
* 1. no irq will arrive before the postinstall
* 2. display is not yet resumed
*/
xe->irq.enabled = true;
atomic_set(&xe->irq.enabled, 1);
xe_irq_reset(xe);
xe_irq_postinstall(xe); /* turn irqs on */
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment