Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 5c6ca9d9 authored by  's avatar   Committed by Herbert Xu
Browse files

X.509: Introduce scope-based x509_certificate allocation


Add a DEFINE_FREE() clause for x509_certificate structs and use it in
x509_cert_parse() and x509_key_preparse().  These are the only functions
where scope-based x509_certificate allocation currently makes sense.
A third user will be introduced with the forthcoming SPDM library
(Security Protocol and Data Model) for PCI device authentication.

Unlike most other DEFINE_FREE() clauses, this one checks for IS_ERR()
instead of NULL before calling x509_free_certificate() at end of scope.
That's because the "constructor" of x509_certificate structs,
x509_cert_parse(), returns a valid pointer or an ERR_PTR(), but never
NULL.

Comparing the Assembler output before/after has shown they are identical,
save for the fact that gcc-12 always generates two return paths when
__cleanup() is used, one for the success case and one for the error case.

In x509_cert_parse(), add a hint for the compiler that kzalloc() never
returns an ERR_PTR().  Otherwise the compiler adds a gratuitous IS_ERR()
check on return.  Introduce an assume() macro for this which can be
re-used elsewhere in the kernel to provide hints for the compiler.

Suggested-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231003153937.000034ca@Huawei.com/
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/934679/


Signed-off-by: default avatarLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
parent c9ccfd5e
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment