[CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_flip@.*-wf_vblank - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005

Submitted by LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM @l4kshmi

Assigned to Intel GFX Bugs mailing list

Link to original bug (#111938)

Description

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5218/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html

Starting subtest: flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank
(kms_flip:1228) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file ../tests/kms_flip.c:531:
(kms_flip:1228) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005
(kms_flip:1228) CRITICAL: inconsistent vblank ts/seq: last 186.503342/4818, current 186.616776/4828: elapsed=113433.0us expected=110935.0us
Subtest flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank failed.

added CI feature: display/Other platform: CFL platform: ICL platform: TGL priority::medium severity::normal + 1 deleted label

CI Bug Log said:

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

New filters associated

* TGL: igt@kms_flip@.*-wf_vblank - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3552/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5217/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14703/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5218/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7034/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7034/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3553/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7035/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7032/re-tgl-u/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7032/re-tgl-u/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7032/re-tgl-u/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14706/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_5132/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14711/shard-tglb4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7037/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7037/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14712/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14716/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7039/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html

Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com said:

Expectation maybe too strict from the facts

• On TGL
  
• 14 / 25 runs (56.0%) of failure rate
  
• elapsed=113433.0us expected=110935.0us

CI Bug Log said:

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- TGL: igt@kms_flip@.-wf_vblank - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 -}
{+ ICL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.-wf_vblank - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_396/fi-icl-y/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check.html

CI Bug Log said:

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- ICL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.-wf_vblank - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 -}
{+ ICL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.-wf_vblank - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_396/fi-icl-y/igt@kms_flip@blocking-wf_vblank.html
  
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_396/fi-icl-y/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html

CI Bug Log said:

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- ICL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.-wf_vblank - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 -}
{+ WHL ICL TGL: igt@kms_flip@. - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_397/fi-whl-u/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible.html
  
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_397/fi-whl-u/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html
  
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_397/fi-whl-u/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible.html
  
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_397/fi-whl-u/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

WHL ICL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 WHL ICL EHL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_425/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_425/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_425/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_425/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_425/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_426/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_426/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_426/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_426/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_426/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_427/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_427/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_427/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_427/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_427/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_427/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_428/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_428/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_428/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_428/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_428/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_429/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_429/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_429/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_429/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_429/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@blocking-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_424/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@2x-wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_424/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_424/fi-ehl-1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check.html

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

WHL ICL EHL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 CTG WHL ICL EHL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7910/fi-ctg-p8600/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7917/fi-ctg-p8600/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7913/fi-ctg-p8600/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html

added platform: EHL label

added platform: GM45 label

added priority::high label

removed priority::medium label

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum.

Removed filters

• CTG WHL ICL EHL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 (added on 14 minutes ago)

New filters associated

• CTG WHL ICL EHL TGL: igt@kms_flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 (No new failures associated)

• EHL: igt@kms_flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: fabs((elapsed - expected) / expected) <= 0.005 (No new failures associated)

Last seen drmtip_496 (1 month, 3 weeks old). Closing this issue based on 10x rule.

closed

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived.

New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.