Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

igt@kms_vblank@*-accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

    • Closed Issue created by Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration

    Submitted by Martin Peres @mupuf

    Assigned to Intel GFX Bugs mailing list

    Link to original bug (#102583)

    Description

    On CI_DRM_3048, the machine shard-hsw hit the following assert when running igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle:

    (kms_vblank:1685) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file kms_vblank.c:201:
    (kms_vblank:1685) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
    (kms_vblank:1685) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
    (kms_vblank:1685) CRITICAL: error: 716 != 715

    Full logs: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3048/shard-hsw6/igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle.html

    Edited
    To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information

    Child items ...

    • Activity

    • Bugzilla Migration User added CI feature: display/Other platform: ALL priority::low severity::normal + 1 deleted label

      added CI feature: display/Other platform: ALL priority::low severity::normal + 1 deleted label

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Marta Löfstedt @marta said:

      Also,

      (kms_vblank:1467) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file kms_vblank.c:201:
      (kms_vblank:1467) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
      (kms_vblank:1467) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
      (kms_vblank:1467) CRITICAL: error: 12132 != 12129
      Subtest accuracy-idle failed.

      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3222/shard-apl4/igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle.html

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Marta Löfstedt @marta said:

      Also, CI_DRM_3295 GLK-shards:

      (kms_vblank:9829) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file kms_vblank.c:201:
      (kms_vblank:9829) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
      (kms_vblank:9829) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
      (kms_vblank:9829) CRITICAL: error: 1378 != 1376
      Subtest accuracy-idle failed.

      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3295/shard-glkb4/igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle.html

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Marta Löfstedt @marta said:

      Above link are dead, but this issue is still happening:
      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3609/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle.html
      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3542/shard-apl1/igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle.html
      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3542/shard-glkb6/igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle.html

      HSW was long time ago:
      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4051/shard-hsw2/igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle.html

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Marta Löfstedt @marta said:

      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4208/shard-apl7/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle.html
      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4208/shard-glkb6/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle.html


      (kms_vblank:2679) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file kms_vblank.c:250:
      (kms_vblank:2679) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
      (kms_vblank:2679) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Marta Löfstedt @marta said:

      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4214/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle.html

      (kms_vblank:4662) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file kms_vblank.c:250:
      (kms_vblank:4662) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
      (kms_vblank:4662) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
      (kms_vblank:4662) CRITICAL: error: 4384 != 4382
      Subtest pipe-C-accuracy-idle failed.

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Marta Löfstedt @marta said:

      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3751/shard-snb2/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle.html

      (kms_vblank:2022) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file kms_vblank.c:255:
      (kms_vblank:2022) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
      (kms_vblank:2022) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
      (kms_vblank:2022) CRITICAL: error: 458 != 457
      Subtest pipe-B-accuracy-idle failed.

      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4232/shard-apl6/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle.html

      (kms_vblank:3015) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file kms_vblank.c:255:
      (kms_vblank:3015) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
      (kms_vblank:3015) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
      (kms_vblank:3015) CRITICAL: error: 661 != 658
      Subtest pipe-B-accuracy-idle failed.

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Marta Löfstedt @marta said:

      https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_11/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle.html

      (kms_vblank:4062) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file ../tests/kms_vblank.c:255:
      (kms_vblank:4062) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target
      (kms_vblank:4062) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
      (kms_vblank:4062) CRITICAL: error: 10058 != 10057
      Subtest pipe-A-accuracy-idle failed.

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: Arkadiusz Hiler @ivyl said:

      Bug was quite reproducible 10 months ago. Something has changed back then and after that we have seen it very few times (about once every 100 runs).

      The issue was last seen 4 months ago.

      We can close it when we hit CI_DRM_5949 without hitting it again (10*100 = 1000 runs since the last occurrence).

    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM @l4kshmi said:

      (In reply to Arek Hiler from comment 8)

      Bug was quite reproducible 10 months ago. Something has changed back then
      and after that we have seen it very few times (about once every 100 runs).

      The issue was last seen 4 months ago.

      We can close it when we hit CI_DRM_5949 without hitting it again (10*100 =
      1000 runs since the last occurrence).


      This is appearing again and failed couple of times during this week on BSW/GLK.
    • Bugzilla Migration User
      Bugzilla Migration User @bugzilla-migration ·
      Author

      :speech_balloon: LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM @l4kshmi said:

      Seeting the priority to low based on Ankit's assessment.
      Assessment:
      Reproducible : 1-2% From recent history the test is passing for the mentioned platforms, The issue seems to be very rare.
      Impact : Low. There is only 1 vblank mismatch in most of the cases.
      Fdo bug : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102583

      What does the sub-test do:
      the test accuracy idle, tests the accuracy of the vblank events received by the userspace.
      The test sets a target of say 'n' vblanks and gets the absolute sequence of the current vblank say 'x'.
      Theoretically after 'n' vblanks, we should get the 'n' th vblank's absolute sequence no. as (n + x).

      The issue:
      The cases that fail, though rare, have the actual absolute vblank sequence no. (received after 'n' vblanks) more than the expected value.

    • Tejasree Illipilli
      Tejasree Illipilli @tejasree ·
      Reporter

      igt@kms_vblank@*-accuracy-idle- Testcases are passing , issue is not reproducing on ALL Platforms , Last seen issue on IGT_5849_full (1 week, 4 days old).

      Hence closing the issue #43 (closed)

    • Tejasree Illipilli closed

      closed

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived.

      New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.

    • Tejasree Illipilli reopened

      reopened

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been restored.

      All the previous filters are now active.

    • Tejasree Illipilli
      Tejasree Illipilli @tejasree ·
      Reporter

      Issue is reproducing on GLK with IGT_5958_full

      Issue is reproducing on SKL with CI_DRM_9609_full

    • LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM removed platform: ALL label

      removed platform: ALL label

    • LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM added platform: GLK platform: JSL platform: PNV platform: SKL labels

      added platform: GLK platform: JSL platform: PNV platform: SKL labels

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

      Description: allPNV machinesSKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-skl10", "shard-skl9", "fi-pnv-d510", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "jsl3", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "bat-jsl-2", "shard-glk2", "bat-jsl-1", "shard-glk5", "fi-jsl-1", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-skl-caroline"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["GLK", "PNV", "SKL", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      No new failures caught with the new filter

    • LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM changed title from [CI] igt@kms_vblank@*-accuracy-idle - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target to igt@kms_vblank@*-accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      changed title from [CI] igt@kms_vblank@*-accuracy-idle - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target to igt@kms_vblank@*-accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

    • Ravi V added platform: G45 label

      added platform: G45 label

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

      Description: ELK PNV SKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-skl10", "shard-skl9", "fi-pnv-d510", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-elk-e7500", "bat-jsl-3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "jsl3", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "bat-jsl-2", "shard-glk2", "bat-jsl-1", "shard-glk5", "fi-jsl-1", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-skl-caroline"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["GLKPNV", "PNVELK", "SKL", "GLK", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      New failures caught by the filter:

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

      Description: BSW ELK PNV SKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "fi-glk-1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-skl10", "shard-skl9", "fi-pnv-d510", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-bsw-n3050", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-elk-e7500", "bat-jsl-3", "fi-bsw-nick", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "jsl3", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "bat-jsl-2", "shard-glk2", "bat-jsl-1", "shard-glk5", "fi-jsl-1", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["PNV", "ELK", "BSW", "SKL", "GLK", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      New failures caught by the filter:

    • Ravi V added platform: BSW/CHT label

      added platform: BSW/CHT label

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

      Description: TGL BSW ELK PNV SKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-glk-1", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-skl-6260u", "fi-pnv-d510", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-bsw-n3050", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-elk-e7500", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-tgl-u", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "shard-tglb", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "fi-bsw-nick", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "jsl3", "bat-jsl-2", "bat-jsl-1", "fi-jsl-1", "fi-tgl-1115g4", "shard-tglu-3", "shard-tglu-4", "shard-tglu-2", "shard-tglu-7", "shard-tglu-6", "shard-tglu-8", "shard-tglu-1", "shard-tglu", "shard-tglu-5", "bat-jsl-3"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["PNV", "ELK", "BSW", "SKL", "TGL", "GLK", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      New failures caught by the filter:

    • Prudhvi Kambhampati added CI_IGT_test platform: TGL labels

      added CI_IGT_test platform: TGL labels

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

      Description: TGL BSW ELK PNV SKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@.*accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-glk-1", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-skl-6260u", "fi-pnv-d510", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-bsw-n3050", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-elk-e7500", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-bsw-cyan", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-tgl-u", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "shard-tglb", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "fi-bsw-nick", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "jsl3", "bat-jsl-2", "bat-jsl-1", "fi-jsl-1", "fi-tgl-1115g4", "shard-tglu-3", "shard-tglu-4", "shard-tglu-2", "shard-tglu-7", "shard-tglu-6", "shard-tglu-8", "shard-tglu-1", "shard-tglu", "shard-tglu-5", "bat-jsl-3"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["PNV", "ELK", "BSW", "SKL", "TGL", "GLK", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-cd-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      New failures caught by the filter:

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

      Description: TGL BSW ELK PNV SKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@.*accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-glk-1", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-hsw6", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-hsw3", "shard-hsw7", "fi-pnv-d510", "shard-hsw5", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-hsw-4770r", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-hsw8", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-hsw4", "fi-hsw-4770", "fi-elk-e7500", "shard-hsw1", "fi-skl-6700k2", "shard-hsw2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "shard-hsw", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-hsw-4200u", "fi-hsw-peppy", "fi-bsw-cyan", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-tgl-u", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "shard-tglb", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "fi-bsw-nick", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "jsl3", "bat-jsl-2", "bat-jsl-1", "fi-hsw-gt1", "fi-jsl-1", "fi-tgl-1115g4", "shard-tglu-3", "shard-tglu-4", "shard-tglu-2", "shard-tglu-7", "shard-tglu-6", "shard-tglu-8", "shard-tglu-1", "shard-tglu", "shard-tglu-5", "fi-hsw-g3258", "bat-hsw-1", "bat-jsl-3", "fi-tgl-mst"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["PNV", "ELK", "HSW", "BSW", "SKL", "TGL", "GLK", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-d-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      New failures caught by the filter:

    • SAI NANDAN added platform: KBL label

      added platform: KBL label

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

      Description: KBL TGL BSW ELK PNV SKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@.*accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-hsw6", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-hsw3", "shard-kbl5", "shard-hsw7", "shard-kbl4", "fi-pnv-d510", "shard-hsw5", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-hsw-4770r", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-hsw8", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-hsw4", "fi-kbl-7500u", "fi-hsw-4770", "shard-kbl6", "fi-elk-e7500", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-hsw1", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "shard-hsw2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "shard-hsw", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-hsw-4200u", "fi-hsw-peppy", "fi-bsw-cyan", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-tgl-u", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "shard-tglb", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "fi-bsw-nick", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "jsl3", "bat-jsl-2", "bat-jsl-1", "fi-hsw-gt1", "fi-jsl-1", "pig-kbl-iris", "fi-tgl-1115g4", "shard-tglu-3", "shard-tglu-4", "shard-tglu-2", "shard-tglu-7", "shard-tglu-6", "shard-tglu-8", "shard-tglu-1", "shard-tglu", "shard-tglu-5", "fi-hsw-g3258", "bat-hsw-1", "bat-jsl-3", "fi-tgl-mst"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["PNV", "ELK", "HSW", "BSW", "SKL", "TGL", "KBL", "GLK", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-d-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      New failures caught by the filter:

    • CI Bug Log
      CI Bug Log @cibuglog ·
      Reporter

      A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

      Description: BLB KBL TGL BSW ELK PNV SKL GLK JSL: igt@kms_vblank@.*accuracy-idle - fail - Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target

      Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-hsw6", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-hsw3", "shard-kbl5", "shard-hsw7", "shard-kbl4", "fi-pnv-d510", "shard-hsw5", "fi-blb-e6850", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-hsw-4770r", "fi-bsw-n3050", "shard-hsw8", "fi-glk-dsi", "shard-hsw4", "fi-kbl-7500u", "fi-hsw-4770", "shard-kbl6", "fi-elk-e7500", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-hsw1", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "shard-hsw2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk", "shard-hsw", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-hsw-4200u", "fi-hsw-peppy", "fi-bsw-cyan", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-bsw-kefka", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-tgl-u", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "shard-tglb", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "fi-bsw-nick", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "re-jsl-1", "re-jsl-2", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h", "jsl3", "bat-jsl-2", "bat-jsl-1", "fi-hsw-gt1", "fi-jsl-1", "pig-kbl-iris", "fi-tgl-1115g4", "shard-tglu-3", "shard-tglu-4", "shard-tglu-2", "shard-tglu-7", "shard-tglu-6", "shard-tglu-8", "shard-tglu-1", "shard-tglu", "shard-tglu-5", "fi-hsw-g3258", "bat-hsw-1", "bat-jsl-3", "fi-tgl-mst"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["BLB", "PNV", "ELK", "HSW", "BSW", "SKL", "TGL", "KBL", "GLK", "JSL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@kms_vblank@pipe-d-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-accuracy-idle", "igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-accuracy-idle"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: vbl.reply.sequence == target'

      New failures caught by the filter:

    • LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM
      LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM @l4kshmi ·
      Reporter

      On CI, last seen this issue on Jan. 25, 2023, 11:16 p.m. Closing this issue as can not reproduce.

    • LAKSHMINARAYANA VUDUM closed

      closed

    Please register or sign in to reply