igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(5|6)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(5|6) state is not achieved
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10490/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
Out
IGT-Version: 1.26-gf474644e7 (x86_64) (Linux: 5.14.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_10490+ x86_64)
DMC: fw loaded: yes
Starting subtest: dc6-dpms
Stack trace:
#0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1745 __igt_fail_assert()
#1 ../tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c:221 check_dc_counter.isra.3()
#2 [<unknown>+0xdbd]
#3 [<unknown>+0x8]
Subtest dc6-dpms: FAIL (3.259s)
Err
Starting subtest: dc6-dpms
(i915_pm_dc:1393) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_dc_counter, file ../tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c:220:
(i915_pm_dc:1393) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count)
(i915_pm_dc:1393) CRITICAL: DC6 state is not achievedActivity
added platform: EHL platform: RKL labels
added feature: power/Other label
added platform: ADL_P label
changed title from [RKL][EHL] igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC6 state is not achieved to igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC6 state is not achieved
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:
Description: RKL EHL ADL_P: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC6 state is not achieved
Equivalent query: (machine_name IS IN ["fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "re-adlp-pub3", "re-adlp-pub2", "fi-ehl-1", "re-ehl-1", "re-ehl-cham", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "hbd-ehl-1", "fi-ehl-2", "bat-rkl-1", "fi-rkl-11500t", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "bat-adlp-4", "re-adlp-pub1", "shard-rkl"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["EHL", "RKL", "ADL-P"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry\(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count\)\n.*DC6 state is not achieved'
New failures caught by the filter:
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10782/re-adlp-pub3/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10782/re-adlp-pub3/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10762/re-adlp-pub3/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10762/re-adlp-pub3/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html
changed title from igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC6 state is not achieved to igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(6|9)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(6|9) state is not achieved
-
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum.
New filters associated
- ADL_P: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc9-dpms - fail - Failed assertion: dc9_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_target, prev_dc, 3000), DC9 state is not achieved
changed title from igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(6|9)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(6|9) state is not achieved to igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(5|6|9)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(5|6|9) state is not achieved
-
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:
Description: RKL EHL ADL_P: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(5|6)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(5|6) state is not achieved
Equivalent query: (machine_name IS IN ["fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "re-adlp-pub3", "re-adlp-pub2", "re-adlp-5", "fi-ehl-1", "re-ehl-1", "re-ehl-cham", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "hbd-ehl-1", "fi-ehl-2", "bat-rkl-1", "fi-rkl-11500t", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "bat-adlp-4", "re-adlp-pub1", "shard-rkl"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["EHL", "RKL", "ADL-P"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry\(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count\)\n.*DC(6|5) state is not achieved'
New failures caught by the filter:
Issue is seen on ADL-M manual resume run with DRM-10861 and IGT-6275, hence adding ADL-M tag
log: ADLM_DRM_10861_IGT_6275_igt_i915_pm_dc_dc6-dpms_-_Details.html
added platform: ADL_M label
-
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :
Description: RKL EHL ADL_P ADL_M: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(5|6)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(5|6) state is not achieved
Equivalent query: (machine_name IS IN ["fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "re-adlp-pub3", "re-adlp-pub2", "re-adlp-5", "re-adlm", "fi-ehl-1", "re-ehl-1", "re-ehl-cham", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "hbd-ehl-1", "fi-ehl-2", "bat-rkl-1", "fi-rkl-11500t", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "bat-adlp-4", "re-adlp-pub1", "shard-rkl"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["EHL", "RKL", "ADL-M", "ADL-P"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry\(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count\)\n.*DC(6|5) state is not achieved'
New failures caught by the filter:
-
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :
Description: RKL EHL ADL_P ADL_M ADL_S: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(5|6)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(5|6) state is not achieved
Equivalent query: (machine_name IS IN ["fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "bat-adls-5", "re-adlp-pub3", "re-adlp-pub2", "re-adlp-5", "re-adlm", "re-adls", "fi-ehl-1", "re-ehl-1", "re-ehl-cham", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "hbd-ehl-1", "fi-ehl-2", "bat-rkl-1", "fi-rkl-11500t", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "hbd-adl-s1", "re-adls-2", "re-adls-cham2", "bat-adlp-4", "bat-adls-4", "re-adlp-pub1", "bat-adls-3", "shard-rkl"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["EHL", "RKL", "ADL-MP", "ADL-PS", "ADL-M"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry\(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count\)\n.*DC(6|5) state is not achieved'
New failures caught by the filter:
Issue observed on RPL-S in manual resume run with DRM_10991 and IGT_6305.
added platform: RPL_S label
removed platform: ADL_P label
-
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:
Description: RKL EHL ADL_P ADL_M ADL_S: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc(5|6)-[dpms|psr] - fail - Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count),DC(5|6) state is not achieved
Equivalent query: (machine_name IS IN ["fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "bat-adls-5", "re-adlm", "re-adls", "fi-ehl-1", "re-ehl-1", "re-ehl-cham", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "hbd-ehl-1", "fi-ehl-2", "bat-rkl-1", "fi-rkl-11500t", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "hbd-adl-s1", "re-adls-2", "re-adls-cham2", "bat-adls-4", "bat-adls-3", "shard-rkl"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["EHADL-S", "RKL", "ADEHL-P", "ADL-S", "ADL-M"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: dc_state_wait_entry\(data->debugfs_fd, dc_flag, prev_dc_count\)\n.*DC(6|5) state is not achieved'
No new failures caught with the new filter
