igt@gem_eio@kms -fail - Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9794/shard-glk2/igt@gem_eio@kms.html

- Err	
- Starting subtest: kms
- (gem_eio:966) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_wait_elapsed, file ../tests/i915/gem_eio.c:324:
- (gem_eio:966) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit
- (gem_eio:966) CRITICAL: Wake up following reset+wedge took 92.704+-295.754ms (min:14.978ms, median:19.851ms, max:1277.345ms); limit set to 250ms on average and 1250ms maximum
- Subtest kms failed.

added platform: GLK label

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated by .

New filters associated

• GLK : igt@gem_eio@kms -fail - Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9794/shard-glk2/igt@gem_eio@kms.html

added platform: BSW/CHT label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: BSW GLK : igt@gem_eio@kms -fail - Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "fi-glk-1", "fi-bsw-n3050", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-bsw-cyan", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-glk2", "shard-glk", "shard-glk9", "fi-bsw-kefka", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "fi-bsw-nick"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["GLK", "BSW"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_eio@kms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 \* limit'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_855/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_eio@kms.html

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: RKL BSW GLK : igt@gem_eio@kms -fail - Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-glk-1", "fi-bsw-n3050", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-bsw-nick", "fi-glk-j4005", "re-rkl-1", "shard-glk", "hbd-rkl-s1", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "bat-rkl-1", "fi-rkl-11500t", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "shard-glk8", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "fi-bsw-cyan", "shard-glk9", "fi-bsw-kefka", "shard-rkl"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["GLK", "RKL", "BSW"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress", "igt@gem_eio@reset-stress", "igt@gem_eio@kms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 \* limit'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10340/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10343/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10344/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_eio@reset-stress.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10336/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10338/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html

added platform: RKL label

Issue is reproducing on RKL.

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10681/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html

Issue is not observed on GLK. Testcase is passing consistently.

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10669/shard-glk1/igt@gem_eio@kms.html

Issue is not observed on BSW. Testcase is passing consistently.

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_916/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_eio@kms.html

Hence removing GLK and BSW platform tags.

removed platform: BSW/CHT label

removed platform: GLK label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: RKL BSW GLK : igt@gem_eio@kms -fail - Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-rkl-11500t", "fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "shard-rkl", "bat-rkl-1"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["GLK", "RKL", "BSW"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress", "igt@gem_eio@reset-stress", "igt@gem_eio@kms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 \* limit'

No new failures caught with the new filter

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by :

Description: RKL BSW GLK : igt@gem_eio@kms -fail - Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-rkl-11500t", "fi-rkl-11600", "fi-rkl-guc", "shard-rkl-1", "shard-rkl-2", "shard-rkl-3", "shard-rkl-4", "shard-rkl-5", "shard-rkl-6", "re-rkl-1", "hbd-rkl-s1", "shard-rkl", "bat-rkl-1"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["RKL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress", "igt@gem_eio@reset-stress", "igt@gem_eio@kms"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 \* limit'

No new failures caught with the new filter

On CI, last seen this issue on Oct. 5, 2021, noon Closing this issue as can not reproduce.

closed

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived.

New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.