igt@i915_pm_dc@dc[56]-psr - fail - Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode)

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8490/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html

Starting subtest: dc5-psr
(i915_pm_dc:1234) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_dc_state_psr, file ../tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c:317:
(i915_pm_dc:1234) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode)
Subtest dc5-psr failed.

added CI platform: ICL labels

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum.

New filters associated

• ICL: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc[56]-psr - fail - Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode)
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4569/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4571/shard-iclb4/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5657/shard-iclb1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_6412/shard-iclb1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5656/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8490/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8491/shard-iclb4/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17678/shard-iclb1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
  • https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17676/shard-iclb8/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html

In recent times these tests didn't fail on Shards ICL.

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: ICL TGL: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc[56]-psr - fail - Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode)

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["fi-icl-u2", "shard-iclb", "shard-iclb1", "shard-iclb2", "shard-iclb3", "shard-iclb4", "shard-iclb5", "shard-iclb6", "fi-icl-u3", "shard-iclb7", "fi-icl-y", "shard-iclb8", "fi-icl-guc", "fi-icl-dsi", "re-icl-u", "fi-icl-u4", "fi-tgl-u", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-icl-1065g7", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "pig-icl-1065g7", "fi-icl-u"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["ICL", "TGL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry\(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode\)'

No new failures caught with the new filter

Also seen on TGL https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4588/shard-tglb1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html

added platform: TGL label

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:

Description: GEN9 ICL TGL: igt@i915_pm_dc@dc[56]-psr - fail - Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode)

Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-glkb1", "shard-glkb3", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-kbl5", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-glkb6", "shard-glkb2", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "shard-glkb4", "shard-apl8", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-kbl-7500u", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-glkb5", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-cfl-s2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-cfl-8700k", "fi-cfl-u", "fi-cfl-s3", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glkb", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "pig-skl-6600", "pig-glk-j4005", "pig-glk-j5005", "fi-cfl-guc", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-cfl-u2", "pig-skl-6260u", "fi-whl-u", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-cfl-8109u", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-icl-u", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-icl-u2", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "shard-iclb", "shard-iclb1", "shard-iclb2", "shard-iclb3", "shard-iclb4", "shard-iclb5", "shard-iclb6", "fi-icl-u3", "shard-iclb7", "fi-icl-y", "fi-skl-lmem", "shard-iclb8", "fi-icl-guc", "fi-icl-dsi", "re-icl-u", "fi-cml-u", "re-cml-u", "fi-cml-u2", "fi-icl-u4", "fi-tgl-u", "fi-cml-h", "fi-cml-s", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-apl0", "shard-glk0", "shard-kbl0", "shard-skl0", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-icl-1065g7", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "pig-icl-1065g7"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["ICL", "TGL", "GEN9"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr", "igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry\(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode\)'

New failures caught by the filter:

• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_497/fi-kbl-r/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_497/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_497/fi-skl-6600u/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
• https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5662/shard-skl7/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html

added platform: KBL platform: SKL labels

added platform: GEN9 label

• Issue is not reproducing on ICL with IGT_5836 and drmtip_706
• Issue(#1899 (closed)) is not reproducing on TGL ,SKL , KBL platforms. Testcase is failing with different fail assertion, which is tracking through i915#454

Last seen issue#1899 on drmtip_676 (1 month, 1 week old), Hence closing the issue #1899 (closed)

closed

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived.

New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.