igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@.* - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays[i] + 50, Timeslice exceeded request!
Starting dynamic subtest: bcs0
(sysfs_timeslice_duration:999) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_timeout, file ../tests/i915/sysfs_timeslice_duration.c:430:
(sysfs_timeslice_duration:999) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays[i] + 50
(sysfs_timeslice_duration:999) CRITICAL: Timeslice exceeded request!
Dynamic subtest bcs0 failed.Activity
added CI platform: SKL labels
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum.
New filters associated
- SKL: igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@bcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays[i] + 50, Timeslice exceeded request!
The 'within 50ms' is just one of those values that I thought could never possibly be exceeded. Turns out I'm wrong again, and we have some serious jitter in our submission flow. Oh crikey.
(This is not a serious issues per-se, the execution did not hang/crash. But it is a major issue wrt our QoS. If we can't execute the right user workload at the right time, that means unhappy users.)
-
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:
Description: SKL: igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@bcs0.* - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays[i] + 50, Timeslice exceeded request!
Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-skl10", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-skl-caroline"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["SKL"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@bcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vecs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@rcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vcs1"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays\[i\] \+ 50\n.*Timeslice exceeded request!'
New failures caught by the filter:
-
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:
Description: SKLGEN9: igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@.* - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays[i] + 50, Timeslice exceeded request!
Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-glkb1", "shard-glkb3", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-kbl5", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-glkb6", "shard-glkb2", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "shard-glkb4", "shard-apl8", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-kbl-7500u", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-glkb5", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-cfl-s2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-cfl-8700k", "fi-cfl-u", "fi-cfl-s3", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glkb", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "pig-skl-6600", "pig-glk-j4005", "pig-glk-j5005", "fi-cfl-guc", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-cfl-u2", "pig-skl-6260u", "fi-whl-u", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-cfl-8109u", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-cml-u", "re-cml-u", "fi-cml-u2", "fi-cml-h", "fi-cml-s", "shard-apl0", "shard-glk0", "shard-kbl0", "shard-skl0"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["SKLGEN9"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@bcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vecs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@rcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vcs1"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays\[i\] \+ 50\n.*Timeslice exceeded request!'
No new failures caught with the new filter
added platform: TGL label
-
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated by Lakshmi Vudum:
Description: GEN9 TGL: igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@.* - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays[i] + 50, Timeslice exceeded request!
Equivalent query: runconfig_tag IS IN ["DRM-TIP"] AND (machine_name IS IN ["shard-kbl3", "fi-glk-1", "shard-glkb1", "shard-glkb3", "shard-apl6", "fi-skl-6770hq", "fi-skl-6260u", "shard-apl2", "shard-kbl5", "fi-bxt-j4205", "shard-kbl4", "shard-glkb6", "shard-glkb2", "shard-kbl7", "fi-skl-6700hq", "fi-skl-6600u", "shard-apl5", "shard-apl7", "fi-bxt-dsi", "shard-glkb4", "shard-apl8", "shard-apl1", "fi-glk-dsi", "fi-kbl-7500u", "shard-kbl6", "shard-apl4", "shard-glkb5", "shard-kbl1", "fi-kbl-7560u", "shard-apl3", "fi-skl-6700k2", "fi-kbl-r", "fi-kbl-7567u", "fi-cfl-s2", "fi-skl-gvtdvm", "shard-kbl2", "fi-skl-guc", "fi-cfl-8700k", "fi-cfl-u", "fi-cfl-s3", "fi-glk-j4005", "shard-apl", "shard-glk", "shard-kbl", "shard-glk1", "shard-glk3", "shard-glk4", "shard-glk5", "shard-glk2", "shard-glkb", "shard-glk8", "shard-glk6", "shard-glk7", "pig-skl-6600", "pig-glk-j4005", "pig-glk-j5005", "fi-cfl-guc", "fi-kbl-guc", "fi-cfl-u2", "pig-skl-6260u", "fi-whl-u", "fi-kbl-x1275", "shard-glk9", "fi-cfl-8109u", "fi-skl-iommu", "fi-kbl-8809g", "fi-skl-caroline", "fi-apl-nasher", "fi-kbl-soraka", "shard-skl", "shard-skl1", "shard-skl2", "shard-skl3", "shard-skl4", "shard-skl5", "shard-skl6", "shard-skl7", "shard-skl8", "shard-skl9", "shard-skl10", "fi-apl-guc", "fi-skl-lmem", "fi-cml-u", "re-cml-u", "fi-cml-u2", "fi-tgl-u", "fi-cml-h", "fi-cml-s", "re-tgl-u", "fi-tgl-u2", "shard-tglb1", "shard-tglb2", "shard-tglb3", "shard-tglb4", "shard-tglb5", "shard-tglb6", "re-tgl1-display", "re-tgl2-display", "shard-tglb7", "shard-tglb8", "shard-apl0", "shard-glk0", "shard-kbl0", "shard-skl0", "shard-tglb0", "fi-tgl-y", "re-tgl-y", "shard-tglb9", "re-tgl-cham", "fi-tgl-guc", "re-tgl-u2", "fi-tgl-dsi", "ba-tgl-1", "custom-tgl-joshikun", "tgl-u-lpddr-ba", "re-tgl-u3", "fi-tgl-h"] OR machine_tag IS IN ["TGL", "GEN9"]) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND test_name IS IN ["igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@bcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vecs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@rcs0", "igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vcs1"])) AND ((testsuite_name = "IGT" AND status_name IS IN ["fail"])) AND stderr ~= 'Failed assertion: elapsed / 1000 / 1000 < delays\[i\] \+ 50\n.*Timeslice exceeded request!'
New failures caught by the filter:
Issue is not reproducing on SKL and TGL
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_684/fi-tgl-dsi/igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@vecs0.html
- https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9247/shard-skl9/igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@rcs0.html
Hence closing the issue #1732 (closed)
