-
Thomas Haller authored
Tests are commonly created via copy&paste. Hence, it's better to express a certain concept explicitly via a function or macro. This way, the implementation of the concept can be adjusted at one place, without requiring to change all the callers. Also, the macro is shorter, and brevity is better for tests so it's easier to understand what the test does. Without being bothered by noise from the redundant information. Also, the macro knows better which message to expect. For example, messages inside "src" are prepended by nm-logging.c with a level and a timestamp. The expect macro is aware of that and tests for it #define NMTST_EXPECT_NM_ERROR(msg) NMTST_EXPECT_NM (G_LOG_LEVEL_MESSAGE, "*<error> [*] "msg) This again allows the caller to ignore this prefix, but still assert more strictly.
25ade397