wayland issueshttps://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues2018-06-30T09:32:35Zhttps://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/26Naming of input devices in Wayland2018-06-30T09:32:35ZBugzilla Migration UserNaming of input devices in Wayland## Submitted by Jehan Pagès `@jehan`
Assigned to **Wayland bug list**
**[Link to original bug (#103979)](https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103979)**
## Description
Created attachment 135815
Naming of devices under X.
W...## Submitted by Jehan Pagès `@jehan`
Assigned to **Wayland bug list**
**[Link to original bug (#103979)](https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103979)**
## Description
Created attachment 135815
Naming of devices under X.
With X, input devices in GIMP have a quite human-understandable name.
Like "Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 Pen stylus".
With Wayland, in GIMP, this becomes "xwayland-stylus:13".
The name became generic, and not really made for human.
Do we have some code to change in GIMP to get a human-targetted name for devices when it runs under Wayland?
**Attachment 135815**, "Naming of devices under X.":
![Screenshot_from_2017-11-29_22-26-41](/uploads/9f4f36daf3d1b3af17fa9d72fb3b8c92/Screenshot_from_2017-11-29_22-26-41.png)Peter HuttererPeter Huttererhttps://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/25zwp_confined_pointer_v1.unconfined vs. wl_pointer.leave ordering is undefined2018-07-02T05:48:50ZBugzilla Migration Userzwp_confined_pointer_v1.unconfined vs. wl_pointer.leave ordering is undefined## Submitted by Pekka Paalanen
Assigned to **Wayland bug list**
**[Link to original bug (#106704)](https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106704)**
## Description
The specification text on zwp_confined_pointer_v1 is not clea...## Submitted by Pekka Paalanen
Assigned to **Wayland bug list**
**[Link to original bug (#106704)](https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106704)**
## Description
The specification text on zwp_confined_pointer_v1 is not clear whether a specific ordering between the unconfined and wl_pointer.leave events should be guaranteed. On the other hand, it does guarantee that the confined event can only arrive while in pointer focus, so the ordering between confined and wl_pointer.enter is clearly specified.
I propose to require that also the unconfined event can only be sent while having pointer focus.
According to https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/221802/ GNOME and Weston currently implement the opposite behaviours.