connection: avoid calling memcpy on NULL, 0
Due to what is arguably a mistake in the C language specification, passing NULL to memcpy and friends is undefined behavior (UB) even when the count is 0. C additionally mistakenly leaves NULL + 0 and NULL - NULL undefined. (C++ fixes this mistake.) These are very problematic because (NULL, 0) is a natural representation of the empty slice. Some details: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49459 https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html Unfortunately, despite how clearly this is a mistake, glibc headers and GCC now try to exploit this specification mistake and will miscompile code, so C projects need to workaround this. In particular, UBSan from Clang will flag this as a bug (although Clang itself has the good sense to never lean on this bug). We've run into a few UBSan errors in Chromium stemming from Wayland's memcpy calls. Add runtime guards as needed to avoid these cases. Note: Chromium's copy of wayland has !188 applied. It is possible the ring_buffer_copy UB cases are only reachable with that MR applied, I'm not sure. But it seemed simplest to just add the fix to wayland as-is. Then when/if that MR lands, it will pick this up. Signed-off-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
parent
edb943dc
Loading
Loading
Pipeline
#1029413
passed
with stages
in
2 minutes and 13 seconds
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment