Commit a04beb12 authored by Kristian Høgsberg's avatar Kristian Høgsberg

Update TODO

We've knocked a few items of the list.
parent c450b6e2
Core wayland protocol
- Atomicity. Currently a lot of the atomicity in Wayland relies on
how we batch up all requests in a protocol buffer and only flushes
in the "blockhandler" in the client. Consensus was that we need
something more reliable and explicit. The suggestion is that we
make surface.attach a synchronization point such that everything
before that is batched and applied atomically when the
surface.attach request comes in. For cases where we need atomicity
beyond a surface.attach, we can add an atomic grouping mechanism,
that can group together multiple surface.attach requests into a
bigger atomic change. To be researched a bit.
- Maybe try to make remote wayland actually happen, to see if there
is something in the protocol/architecture that makes it harder than
it should be.
- Add timestamp to touch_cancel, add touch id to touch_cancel (?)
- The output protocol needs to send all the ugly timing details for the modes.
- mime-type guidelines for data_source (ie, both dnd and selection):
......@@ -53,8 +38,6 @@ EWMH
- Don't wl_display_iterate in eglSwapBuffer, send an eventfd fd?
- Land Robert Braggs EGL extensions: frame age, swap with damage
- Make it possible to share buffers from compositor to clients.
......@@ -71,6 +54,7 @@ EGL/gbm
allocate a scanout buffer now" event to the fullscreen-to-be
- glyph cache
......@@ -101,6 +85,7 @@ Misc
switching away from. for minimized windows that we don't want live
thumb nails for. etc.
Clients and ports
- port gtk+
......@@ -120,8 +105,6 @@ Clients and ports
- SDL port, bnf has work in progress here:
- libva + eglimage + kms integration
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment