should we transmit failed state to tp instead of exhausted candidates ?

Submitted by Fabrice Bellet

Assigned to Olivier Crête @ocrete

Link to original bug (#101646)

Description

I'm not sure of this case, but the code handling the conversion from FS_STREAM_STATE_* to TP_STREAM_ENDPOINT_STATE_* looks a bit strange to me in cb_fs_component_state_changed():

switch (fsstate) { default: g_warning ("Unknown Farstream state, returning ExhaustedCandidates"); /* fall through */ case FS_STREAM_STATE_FAILED: state = TP_STREAM_ENDPOINT_STATE_EXHAUSTED_CANDIDATES; break;

Why is state EXHAUSTED_CANDIDATES returned in case of failure, instead of TP_STREAM_ENDPOINT_STATE_FAILED ?

Version: git master