Commit 77f88abd authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Bjorn Helgaas

PCI/MSI: Return -ENOSPC from pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity()

The API of pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() says it returns -ENOSPC if
fewer than @min_vecs interrupt vectors are available for @dev.

However, if a device supports MSI-X but not MSI and a caller requests
@min_vecs that can't be satisfied by MSI-X, we previously returned -EINVAL
(from the failed attempt to enable MSI), not -ENOSPC.

When -ENOSPC is returned, callers may reduce the number IRQs they request
and try again.  Most callers can use the @min_vecs and @max_vecs
parameters to avoid this retry loop, but that doesn't work when using IRQ
affinity "nr_sets" because rebalancing the sets is driver-specific.

This return value bug has been present since pci_alloc_irq_vectors() was
added in v4.10 by aff17164 ("PCI: Provide sensible IRQ vector
alloc/free routines"), but it wasn't an issue because @min_vecs/@max_vecs
removed the need for callers to iteratively reduce the number of IRQs
requested and retry the allocation, so they didn't need to distinguish
-ENOSPC from -EINVAL.

In v5.0, 6da4b3ab ("genirq/affinity: Add support for allocating
interrupt sets") added IRQ sets to the interface, which reintroduced the
need to check for -ENOSPC and possibly reduce the number of IRQs requested
and retry the allocation.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
parent 2e8cb2cf
......@@ -1168,7 +1168,8 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
const struct irq_affinity *affd)
{
static const struct irq_affinity msi_default_affd;
int vecs = -ENOSPC;
int msix_vecs = -ENOSPC;
int msi_vecs = -ENOSPC;
if (flags & PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY) {
if (!affd)
......@@ -1179,16 +1180,17 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
}
if (flags & PCI_IRQ_MSIX) {
vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, NULL, min_vecs, max_vecs,
affd);
if (vecs > 0)
return vecs;
msix_vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, NULL, min_vecs,
max_vecs, affd);
if (msix_vecs > 0)
return msix_vecs;
}
if (flags & PCI_IRQ_MSI) {
vecs = __pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs, affd);
if (vecs > 0)
return vecs;
msi_vecs = __pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs,
affd);
if (msi_vecs > 0)
return msi_vecs;
}
/* use legacy irq if allowed */
......@@ -1199,7 +1201,9 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
}
}
return vecs;
if (msix_vecs == -ENOSPC)
return -ENOSPC;
return msi_vecs;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment