Commit 25b00775 authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

workqueue: Replace call_rcu_sched() with call_rcu()

Now that call_rcu()'s callback is not invoked until after all
preempt-disable regions of code have completed (in addition to explicitly
marked RCU read-side critical sections), call_rcu() can be used in place
of call_rcu_sched().  This commit therefore makes that change.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <>
Acked-by: default avatarTejun Heo <>
parent cb2f5536
......@@ -3396,7 +3396,7 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
/* sched-RCU protected to allow dereferences from get_work_pool() */
call_rcu_sched(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
call_rcu(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
......@@ -3503,14 +3503,14 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
call_rcu_sched(&pwq->rcu, rcu_free_pwq);
call_rcu(&pwq->rcu, rcu_free_pwq);
* If we're the last pwq going away, @wq is already dead and no one
* is gonna access it anymore. Schedule RCU free.
if (is_last)
call_rcu_sched(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
call_rcu(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
......@@ -4195,7 +4195,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
* The base ref is never dropped on per-cpu pwqs. Directly
* schedule RCU free.
call_rcu_sched(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
call_rcu(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
} else {
* We're the sole accessor of @wq at this point. Directly
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment