Commit 7b4ff1ad authored by Mauro Carvalho Chehab's avatar Mauro Carvalho Chehab

mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST

There are a few issues on some kernel-doc markups that was
causing troubles with kernel-doc output on ReST format:

./kernel/futex.c:492: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
./kernel/futex.c:1264: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
./kernel/futex.c:1721: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
./kernel/futex.c:2338: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
./kernel/futex.c:2426: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
./kernel/futex.c:2899: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
./kernel/futex.c:2972: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.

Fix them.

No functional changes.
Acked-by: default avatarDarren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
parent e548cdef
......@@ -214,9 +214,9 @@ enum mutex_trylock_recursive_enum {
* raisins, and once those are gone this will be removed.
*
* Returns:
* MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED - trylock failed,
* MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS - lock acquired,
* MUTEX_TRYLOCK_RECURSIVE - we already owned the lock.
* - MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED - trylock failed,
* - MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS - lock acquired,
* - MUTEX_TRYLOCK_RECURSIVE - we already owned the lock.
*/
static inline /* __deprecated */ __must_check enum mutex_trylock_recursive_enum
mutex_trylock_recursive(struct mutex *lock)
......
......@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static void drop_futex_key_refs(union futex_key *key)
*
* Return: a negative error code or 0
*
* The key words are stored in *key on success.
* The key words are stored in @key on success.
*
* For shared mappings, it's (page->index, file_inode(vma->vm_file),
* offset_within_page). For private mappings, it's (uaddr, current->mm).
......@@ -1259,9 +1259,9 @@ static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, u32 newval)
* @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0)
*
* Return:
* 0 - ready to wait;
* 1 - acquired the lock;
* <0 - error
* - 0 - ready to wait;
* - 1 - acquired the lock;
* - <0 - error
*
* The hb->lock and futex_key refs shall be held by the caller.
*/
......@@ -1717,9 +1717,9 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key,
* hb1 and hb2 must be held by the caller.
*
* Return:
* 0 - failed to acquire the lock atomically;
* >0 - acquired the lock, return value is vpid of the top_waiter
* <0 - error
* - 0 - failed to acquire the lock atomically;
* - >0 - acquired the lock, return value is vpid of the top_waiter
* - <0 - error
*/
static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex,
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
......@@ -1785,8 +1785,8 @@ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex,
* uaddr2 atomically on behalf of the top waiter.
*
* Return:
* >=0 - on success, the number of tasks requeued or woken;
* <0 - on error
* - >=0 - on success, the number of tasks requeued or woken;
* - <0 - on error
*/
static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags,
u32 __user *uaddr2, int nr_wake, int nr_requeue,
......@@ -2142,8 +2142,8 @@ static inline void queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
* be paired with exactly one earlier call to queue_me().
*
* Return:
* 1 - if the futex_q was still queued (and we removed unqueued it);
* 0 - if the futex_q was already removed by the waking thread
* - 1 - if the futex_q was still queued (and we removed unqueued it);
* - 0 - if the futex_q was already removed by the waking thread
*/
static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
{
......@@ -2333,9 +2333,9 @@ static long futex_wait_restart(struct restart_block *restart);
* acquire the lock. Must be called with the hb lock held.
*
* Return:
* 1 - success, lock taken;
* 0 - success, lock not taken;
* <0 - on error (-EFAULT)
* - 1 - success, lock taken;
* - 0 - success, lock not taken;
* - <0 - on error (-EFAULT)
*/
static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
{
......@@ -2422,8 +2422,8 @@ static void futex_wait_queue_me(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
* with no q.key reference on failure.
*
* Return:
* 0 - uaddr contains val and hb has been locked;
* <1 - -EFAULT or -EWOULDBLOCK (uaddr does not contain val) and hb is unlocked
* - 0 - uaddr contains val and hb has been locked;
* - <1 - -EFAULT or -EWOULDBLOCK (uaddr does not contain val) and hb is unlocked
*/
static int futex_wait_setup(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned int flags,
struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket **hb)
......@@ -2895,8 +2895,8 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
* called with the hb lock held.
*
* Return:
* 0 = no early wakeup detected;
* <0 = -ETIMEDOUT or -ERESTARTNOINTR
* - 0 = no early wakeup detected;
* - <0 = -ETIMEDOUT or -ERESTARTNOINTR
*/
static inline
int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
......@@ -2968,8 +2968,8 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
* If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT.
*
* Return:
* 0 - On success;
* <0 - On error
* - 0 - On success;
* - <0 - On error
*/
static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset,
......
......@@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static void __sched __mutex_lock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock);
* (or statically defined) before it can be locked. memset()-ing
* the mutex to 0 is not allowed.
*
* ( The CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES .config option turns on debugging
* checks that will enforce the restrictions and will also do
* deadlock debugging. )
* (The CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES .config option turns on debugging
* checks that will enforce the restrictions and will also do
* deadlock debugging)
*
* This function is similar to (but not equivalent to) down().
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment