GitLab

Fixes #20

Build and install with meson, build and install with autotools and then run
diff to compare the two directory trees. They should be the same.

This does not install the legacy protocols, they're behind a configure switch.
The spec-build is disabled in autotools because we know meson doesn't do that
yet, so no point in comparing those.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

This now matches the autotools installation
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Generated outputs are identical
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

autotools can't pass arguments, so let's default to 'verify' in the script
itself and for distcheck to succeed, we need to set an environment variable to
search for the header (it's an out-of-tree build).

And due to the very faint chance of there being no python during the
xorgproto build, let's make that conditional too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

More readable grouping this way
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

An alphabetically ordered list is nice, but it's harder to figure out
based on a diff whether a commit affects the legacy protocols or not.
Let's group those separately, first the normal protocol files, then all the
legacy-only ones.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

No change to the header, comments only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

These keysyms were already present in 2.6.11 which is the first tag in git.

A few notes on specific keys here:
- KEY_EJECTCLOSECD is theoretically different to XF86XK_Eject (kernel
  KEY_EJECTCD) but the actual usage in the hwdb remappings seems to be
  random. Either way it's already mapped to XF86XK_Eject in
  symbols/inet so let's just add an entry for the sake of documenting it.
- XF86XK_CycleAngle seems like the best match for KEY_ANGLE
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

A few notes on specific keys here:
- Some existing keysyms used some brand names. e.g. KEY_WORDPROCESSOR ->
  existing XF86XK_Word. This introduces some minor inconsistency with
  unbranded new keys like KEY_GRAPHICSEDITOR -> XF86XK_GraphicsEditor.
- XF86XK_DisplayToggle is *not* XF86XK_Display (which represents
  KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

A few notes on specific keys here:
- There are exiting XF86XK_ZoomIn/Out keys, but they don't seem appropriate
  for KEY_CAMERA_ZOOMIN and friends. New symbols are introduced here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

ALSToggle has a terrible name, it's the Ambient Light Sensor. But it matches
the kernel define so...
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

This keysym is already available under a different name, see
xorg/proto/xorgproto@000ebed5

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

The Linux kernel adds a few evdev keycodes roughly every other release. These
aren't available as keysyms through XKB until they have been added as keycode
in xkeyboard-config and mapped there to a newly defined keysym in the X11
proto headers.

In the past, this was done manually,  a suitable keysym was picked at
random and the mapping updated accordingly. This doesn't scale very well and,
given we have a large reserved range for XF86 keysyms anyway, can be done
easier.

Let's reserve the range 0x10081XXX range for a 1:1 mapping of Linux kernel
codes. That's 4095 values, the kernel currently uses only 767 anyway. The
lower 3 bytes of keysyms within that range have to match the kernel value to
make them easy to add and search for. Nothing in X must care about the actual
keysym value anyway.

Since we expect this to be parsed by other scripts for automatic updating, the
format of those #defines is quite strict. Add a script to generate keycodes as
well...

Build an Arch image that tests a meson build with all build options we support
(well, the single one so far).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

We've been adding to those over the last few years. Not a huge amount but
enough that we should stop pretending we don't touch that header.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

They are fixed length (4 characters), and don't need NUL-terminators.
This makes gcc stop warning when they're not NUL-terminated, and instead
warn if they are passed to functions expecting NUL-terminated strings.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>