From eed77101d32e5185e5d08f6a11b231adb1c1f123 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 17:45:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] report-fossils: larger subgroup size is better
Almost all the time ;)
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
---
report-fossil.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/report-fossil.py b/report-fossil.py
index 9f7b738..3c4b011 100755
--- a/report-fossil.py
+++ b/report-fossil.py
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ statistics = [
Statistic(internal_name='read_stalls', csv_names=['Read Stalls'], display_name='Read Stalls'),
# Anv statistics
- Statistic(internal_name='subgroup_size', csv_names=['Subgroup size'], display_name='Subgroup size'),
+ Statistic(internal_name='subgroup_size', csv_names=['Subgroup size'], display_name='Subgroup size', more_is_better=True),
Statistic(internal_name='send_count', csv_names=['SEND Count'], display_name='Send messages'),
Statistic(internal_name='loop_count', csv_names=['Loop Count'], display_name='Loop count'),
Statistic(internal_name='cycle_count', csv_names=['Cycle Count'], display_name='Cycle count'),
--
GitLab