Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • mesa mesa
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 3,058
    • Issues 3,058
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 1,002
    • Merge requests 1,002
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • MesaMesa
  • mesamesa
  • Merge requests
  • !1000

docs: html fixes

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Erik Faye-Lund requested to merge kusma/mesa:oh-no-more-html-fixes into master Jun 04, 2019
  • Overview 13
  • Commits 27
  • Pipelines 10
  • Changes 35

Here's another batch of HTML cleanups for the documentation.

Generally speaking, here's what it does:

  • Remove all use of <br>-tags. Using them for non-content purposes like layout is out-of-spec for HTML.
  • Remove all use of <tt>-tags. This tag has been removed from HTML5, so the world isn't too happy to see it in use.
  • Add more <code>-tags around identifiers, filenames, code-snippets etc. This improves readability.
  • Switch some lists from unordered lists to definition lists, as this conveys what they are a bit cleaner.
  • And generally: structure some of the HTML a bit more. HTML has a lot of nice features that we're not really taking advantage of.

There's a lot more minor stuff in there as well.

Another point that's worth bringing up is that I realized that one of our releases lacked MD5sums for the archives. I've downloaded these from our file-archive, computed them, and added it to the document. If someone else could confirm these MD5sums, that'd be great.

Edited Jun 04, 2019 by Erik Faye-Lund
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: oh-no-more-html-fixes