-
When an existing peer-reflexive remote candidate is updated to a server reflexive one, due to the late reception of remove candidates, this update has several consequences on the conncheck list: - pair foundations and priorities must be recomputed - the highest nominated pair may have changed too - this is not strictly required, but some pairs that had *a lower* priority than the previously peer-reflexive nominated pair, had their retransmit flag set to false, for this reason. These pairs may now have *a higher* priority than the newly promoted nominated pair, and it is fair in that case to turn their retransmit flag back to true.
0c142b36