Follow-up from "Instant rate change support"
The following discussion from !295 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@ndufresne started a discussion: (+1 comment)
I've seen this tricky pattern couple of times now, maybe it's time to add a helper ?
The following discussion from !295 (merged) should be addressed:
@ndufresne started a discussion: (+1 comment)
I've seen this tricky pattern couple of times now, maybe it's time to add a helper ?