Skip to content

rtpav1: Decide whether to move into a combined rtp plugin/crate or keep separate

The following discussion from !802 (merged) should be addressed:

  • @slomo started a discussion: (+2 comments)

    I wonder if we should put all this into a general gst-plugin-rtp crate (but then this conflicts with the C RTP plugin and we'd have to prefix it with something else).

    Any opinions here?

Distros are usually packaging crate by crate and that's also how it would end up on crates.io. I think it would be good to figure out whether a combined RTP crate would make more sense or not before the next release.

The ONVIF RTP (de)payloaders would stay separately because it uses some ONVIF metadata parsing helpers that are used in multiple places in the onvif plugin.

Edited by Sebastian Dröge
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information