From 9dcbc4e07087f750010c32b1c56fe1af8792a0ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:14:19 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] sunrpc: don't take ->sv_lock when updating ->sv_nrthreads. As documented in svc_xprt.c, sv_nrthreads is protected by the service mutex, and it does not need ->sv_lock. (->sv_lock is needed only for sv_permsocks, sv_tempsocks, and sv_tmpcnt). So remove the unnecessary locking. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> --- net/sunrpc/svc.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c index 9442ebf38bbd9..f30eeae56c448 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c @@ -721,10 +721,7 @@ svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int node) if (!rqstp) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); serv->sv_nrthreads += 1; - spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); - pool->sp_nrthreads += 1; /* Protected by whatever lock the service uses when calling @@ -959,10 +956,7 @@ svc_exit_thread(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) list_del_rcu(&rqstp->rq_all); pool->sp_nrthreads -= 1; - - spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); serv->sv_nrthreads -= 1; - spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); svc_sock_update_bufs(serv); svc_rqst_free(rqstp); -- GitLab