-
Petri Latvala authored
Multiple misunderstandings of the expectations of the test and some missed parts of the shell-to-c conversion caused a couple of issues to remain. First, we need to actually disable a subbank before we check that a subbank is disabled (invoke the tool with -d). Second, the original pipe to wc -l was to check that the tool prints only one line, not that it prints "at least" a line. Modify the last check to verify that an "is disabled" text is _not_ printed. v2: Add a TODO comment Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101650 Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
51d800ff