Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
D
dbus
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 242
    • Issues 242
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 31
    • Merge Requests 31
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • dbus
  • dbus
  • Issues
  • #322

Closed
Open
Opened Nov 24, 2020 by Ralf Habacker@rhabackerMaintainer

Do not waste maintainer time and CI time on rebasing MRs that are otherwise OK.

from !193 (comment 702966)

I think we should seriously consider going back to "Merge method: Merge commit" instead of "Merge method: Merge commit with semi-linear history", so that we don't have to waste maintainer time and CI time on rebasing MRs that are otherwise OK.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: dbus/dbus#322