Something is weird with the 0

In Chinese, the number 0 can have two forms:

• 零 - U+96F6, CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-96F6
• 〇 - U+3007, IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO

The former has code mboii in both CJ3 and CJ5. The latter has code xxxxx… but only in CJ5, it has no code in CJ3.

This means there is no way to type 〇 in CJ3.

However, in CJ3 there is another character with code xxxxx: ○ (U+25CB, WHITE CIRCLE). This character looks very similar to 〇, which makes me think it was incorrectly used instead of 〇 by whoever assembled the CJ3 code.

Should we remove xxxxx from ○ in CJ3 and instead give it to 〇?

This would be:

diff --git a/data/table.txt b/data/table.txt
index ebf84c8..2895d0d 100644
--- a/data/table.txt
+++ b/data/table.txt
@@ -35,3 +35,3 @@
 ◇ NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 yyybe yyybe,za NA 0
-○ NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 xxr,xxxxx,yyybk yyybk,za NA 0
+○ NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 xxr,yyybk yyybk,za NA 0
 ◎ NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 yyybn yyybn,za NA 0
@@ -44,3 +44,3 @@
 。 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 zxad zxad . 2
-〇 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 NA xxxxx NA 0
+〇 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 xxxxx xxxxx NA 0
 〈 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 yyyae,zxby yyyae,za,zxby ' 6

---

In addition, since 零 and 〇 are alternative forms of each other, should we add the mboii code to 〇?

This would be:

diff --git a/data/table.txt b/data/table.txt
index ebf84c8..8ee4e4c 100644
--- a/data/table.txt
+++ b/data/table.txt
@@ -44,3 +44,3 @@
 。 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 zxad zxad . 2
-〇 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 NA xxxxx NA 0
+〇 NA 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 mboii mboii,xxxxx NA 0
 〈 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 yyyae,zxby yyyae,za,zxby ' 6