From 9831c6253ace48051189f6d18a15f658f94babc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 22:17:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cfi: Extend ENDBR sealing to kCFI
Kees noted that IBT sealing could be extended to kCFI.
Fundamentally it is the list of functions that do not have their
address taken and are thus never called indirectly. It doesn't matter
that objtool uses IBT infrastructure to determine this list, once we
have it it can also be used to clobber kCFI hashes and avoid kCFI
indirect calls.
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230622144321.494426891%40infradead.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 27e0cb4d062a1..04b25a2752339 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -778,6 +778,8 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_returns(s32 *start, s32 *end) { }
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
+static void poison_cfi(void *addr);
+
static void __init_or_module poison_endbr(void *addr, bool warn)
{
u32 endbr, poison = gen_endbr_poison();
@@ -802,6 +804,9 @@ static void __init_or_module poison_endbr(void *addr, bool warn)
/*
* Generated by: objtool --ibt
+ *
+ * Seal the functions for indirect calls by clobbering the ENDBR instructions
+ * and the kCFI hash value.
*/
void __init_or_module noinline apply_seal_endbr(s32 *start, s32 *end)
{
@@ -812,7 +817,7 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_seal_endbr(s32 *start, s32 *end)
poison_endbr(addr, true);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FINEIBT))
- poison_endbr(addr - 16, false);
+ poison_cfi(addr - 16);
}
}
@@ -1177,6 +1182,41 @@ static void __apply_fineibt(s32 *start_retpoline, s32 *end_retpoline,
pr_err("Something went horribly wrong trying to rewrite the CFI implementation.\n");
}
+static inline void poison_hash(void *addr)
+{
+ *(u32 *)addr = 0;
+}
+
+static void poison_cfi(void *addr)
+{
+ switch (cfi_mode) {
+ case CFI_FINEIBT:
+ /*
+ * __cfi_\func:
+ * osp nopl (%rax)
+ * subl $0, %r10d
+ * jz 1f
+ * ud2
+ * 1: nop
+ */
+ poison_endbr(addr, false);
+ poison_hash(addr + fineibt_preamble_hash);
+ break;
+
+ case CFI_KCFI:
+ /*
+ * __cfi_\func:
+ * movl $0, %eax
+ * .skip 11, 0x90
+ */
+ poison_hash(addr + 1);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
#else
static void __apply_fineibt(s32 *start_retpoline, s32 *end_retpoline,
@@ -1184,6 +1224,8 @@ static void __apply_fineibt(s32 *start_retpoline, s32 *end_retpoline,
{
}
+static void poison_cfi(void *addr) { }
+
#endif
void apply_fineibt(s32 *start_retpoline, s32 *end_retpoline,
--
GitLab