1. 21 May, 2019 1 commit
  2. 20 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  3. 18 Apr, 2019 1 commit
    • Thomas Haller's avatar
      shared: move most of "shared/nm-utils" to "shared/nm-glib-aux" · d984b2ce
      Thomas Haller authored
      From the files under "shared/nm-utils" we build an internal library
      that provides glib-based helper utilities.
      Move the files of that basic library to a new subdirectory
      "shared/nm-glib-aux" and rename the helper library "libnm-core-base.la"
      to "libnm-glib-aux.la".
       - the name "utils" is overused in our code-base. Everything's an
         "utils". Give this thing a more distinct name.
       - there were additional files under "shared/nm-utils", which are not
         part of this internal library "libnm-utils-base.la". All the files
         that are part of this library should be together in the same
         directory, but files that are not, should not be there.
       - the new name should better convey what this library is and what is isn't:
         it's a set of utilities and helper functions that extend glib with
         funcitonality that we commonly need.
      There are still some files left under "shared/nm-utils". They have less
      a unifying propose to be in their own directory, so I leave them there
      for now. But at least they are separate from "shared/nm-glib-aux",
      which has a very clear purpose.
      (cherry picked from commit 80db06f7)
  4. 17 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  5. 15 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  6. 12 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  7. 06 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  8. 03 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  9. 02 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  10. 19 Mar, 2019 1 commit
    • Lubomir Rintel's avatar
      all: goodbye libnm-glib · 1de8383a
      Lubomir Rintel authored
      This removes libnm-glib, libnm-glib-vpn, and libnm-util for good.
      The it has been replaced with libnm since NetworkManager 1.0, disabled
      by default since 1.12 and no up-to-date distributions ship it for years
      Removing the libraries allows us to:
      * Remove the horrible hacks that were in place to deal with accidental use
        of both the new and old library in a single process.
      * Relief the translators of maintenance burden of similar yet different
      * Get rid of known bad code without chances of ever getting fixed
        (libnm-glib/nm-object.c and libnm-glib/nm-object-cache.c)
      * Generally lower the footprint of the releases and our workspace
      If there are some really really legacy users; they can just build
      libnm-glib and friends from the NetworkManager-1.16 distribution. The
      D-Bus API is stable and old libnm-glib will keep working forever.
  11. 26 Feb, 2019 2 commits
  12. 25 Feb, 2019 4 commits
  13. 22 Feb, 2019 1 commit
    • Thomas Haller's avatar
      libnm,cli: add NMSettingWireGuard · b521f426
      Thomas Haller authored
      For now only add the core settings, no peers' data.
      To support peers and the allowed-ips of the peers is more complicated
      and will be done later. It's more complicated because these are nested
      lists (allowed-ips) inside a list (peers). That is quite unusual and to
      conveniently support that in D-Bus API, in keyfile format, in libnm,
      and nmcli, is a effort.
      Also, it's further complicated by the fact that each peer has a secret (the
      preshared-key). Thus we probably need secret flags for each peer, which
      is a novelty as well (until now we require a fixed set of secrets per
      profile that is well known).
  14. 13 Feb, 2019 1 commit
  15. 01 Feb, 2019 1 commit
    • Thomas Haller's avatar
      wifi-p2p: rename files for consistent Wi-Fi P2P naming · 0420fa1f
      Thomas Haller authored
      We named the types inconsistently:
        - "p2p-wireless" ("libnm-core/nm-setting-p2p-wireless.h")
        - "p2p" ("libnm/nm-p2p-peer.h")
        - "p2p-wifi" ("src/devices/wifi/nm-device-p2p-wifi.h")
      It seems to me, "libnm/nm-p2p-peer.h" should be qualified with a "Wi-Fi"
      specific name. It's not just peer-to-peer, it's Wi-Fi P2P.
      Yes, there is an inconsistency now, because there is already
      It seems to me (from looking at the internet), that the name "Wi-Fi P2P"
      is more common than "P2P Wi-Fi" -- although both are used. There is also
      the name "Wi-Fi Direct". But it's not clear which name should be
      preferred here, so stick to "Wi-Fi P2P".
      In this first commit only rename the files. The following commit will
      rename the content.
  16. 29 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  17. 27 Jan, 2019 2 commits
  18. 24 Jan, 2019 2 commits
  19. 08 Jan, 2019 2 commits
  20. 07 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  21. 29 Nov, 2018 1 commit
    • Lubomir Rintel's avatar
      all: say Wi-Fi instead of "wifi" or "WiFi" · b385ad01
      Lubomir Rintel authored
      Correct the spelling across the *entire* tree, including translations,
      comments, etc. It's easier that way.
      Even the places where it's not exposed to the user, such as tests, so
      that we learn how is it spelled correctly.
  22. 16 Nov, 2018 1 commit
  23. 26 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  24. 16 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  25. 01 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  26. 30 Sep, 2018 1 commit
  27. 13 Sep, 2018 2 commits
  28. 04 Sep, 2018 1 commit
  29. 30 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  30. 21 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  31. 20 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  32. 19 Aug, 2018 1 commit